What's the problem with them being on?
He doesn't want to be controlled by the little men in Europe, probably got a small dick.
Mmmm. If that were the reason then shouldn't the rear lights be on as well?I’m assuming it is so that the car can be seen by others - car drivers, cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians etc when there is low light.
Yes, so why have the powers that be copied Volvo?Not exactly new either. I can remember in the early eighties, Volvo's used to have the sidelights permanently on when running.
No.Is there a sensible reason for DRLs?
I’m assuming it is so that the car can be seen by others - car drivers, cyclists, motorcyclists, pedestrians etc when there is low light. Not exactly new either. I can remember in the early eighties, Volvo's used to have the sidelights permanently on when running.
I don’t think I’ve put just my sidelights on since I moved away from driving cars with dynamo's and started driving cars with alternators! Why would you just have sidelights on - saving electricity? More so when your DRL's are brighter.On my car the DRL turn off when i put the side lights on but the DLR are actually brighter than the sidelights. The whole idea about low light I am thinking low light as in - low in the sky and in your face so perhaps not as useful on the back because cars have break lights.
It was yet another stupid EU directive with unintended( not thought about ) consequences . And now makes the roads more dangerous for motorcyclists.
Yep I know DRL have done away with side lights but obviously you dont get them at the back so I just go to main.I don’t think I’ve put just my sidelights on since I moved away from driving cars with dynamo's and started driving cars with alternators! Why would you just have sidelights on - saving electricity?