Was the referendum "advisory" so that it could be ignored if necessary, but if that was the case, why did Cameron resign when it went against him; or didn't he have the courage to admit that MPs don't believe in democracy.
And even if it was only "advisory" what was the point of having it if not to find out what people wanted parliament to do.
Up till now, I was under the impression that Theresa May was delaying invoking article so that she could get her negotiating team in place, but it's possible that she was hoping that someone would make a legal challenge before she did so.
The pound dropping and our increase in GDP has show that currencies need to be flexible, and that's why the Eurozone is stagnating, so anyone that says that we need to stay in the EU to be successful, doesn't really know what they are doing. The EU's going to fail, and if the MPs get a vote on brexit, and keep us in, then we're doomed.
Remember the referendum had NO legal effect. It was merely advisory. Also remember the majority was only 2%.
Every system has to have some way to decide an outcome. A runner doesn't have to win by a certain margin, just to get ahead of the others by the end of the race, just because there was only a 2% majority, doesn't make the result any less valid; both sides put their arguments in as strong a manner as possible (albeit with all the lies thrown around as well) and then the votes were cast. Those who couldn't vote can't be considered, and those who didn't bother to vote obviously weren't worried whichever way it went, so why keep bringing them into the equation. at the end of the day, there more for brexit than remain, and maybe Theresa May knew that most MPs couldn't be trusted to follow the will of the majority that had bothered to vote
We don't live in a dictatorship where one person has that power
In a dictatorship, the person at the top ignores everyone, and tells them what they are going to do; in this case the supposed dictator is only trying to do what the people asked her to. As there were more MPs that wanted to remain, and tried their hardest to ignore the vote, it would seem that democracy may well be dead. For those who harp on about an unelected PM, they should remember that we vote for a party, not for a PM, and I didn't see anyone scream when Gordon Brown took over from Tony Blair.
However what does "out" ACTUALLY mean? No one knows
Out means we leave the EUs control, the terms of the deal to extricate ourselves from the control of the EU are as yet unknown, simply because whatever so called "option" we decided to go for, it's also up to the EU to agree the terms of the deal, so what's the point of asking what it "actually means" when it's not really up to us.