The guy at
Screwfix said these two in a pack were popular. Only £10. .....Did I make the right choice.
They are "popular" because they are cheap (and let's face it we are a bunch of cheapskates in the UK - or
"we like a bargain"). In trade use they don't last than long, though (tried them - they were more accurate than the Irwin equivalents, but lasted no longer). As to whether or not it was the right choice the question has to be,
"Do they work for you?"
...always been curious, when people bend the tape when for example measuring the height of a door. Where on that bend do they read the exact measurement?
It's done to give a better view of the tape on a tall door and make
estimating the height of an opening easier (there is a bit of experience and judgement in this) - but it still isn't wholly accurate and is why I've taken on board a Hultafors Talmeter tape and a Leica Disto (laser rangefinder). Adding two measurements together as B-A recommends works - providing your arithmetic is good (sadly, it often isn't in my experience of using other people's measures)
That taught me two things. Never ever do a transfer from the original and never ever trust a guy over the phone with a tape in his hand whilst holding a phone.
The latter I'd agree with wholeheartedly. The former, though? Using a rod is definitely transferring the measurement from the original and for centuries has been regarded as the way to go for precise, error-free work because there are only two transfers of a mark (original to rod, rod to material) with no possibility of transposition, misreading, keying-in errors, etc. Transferring measurements into CAD is another area where errors, often transposition of digits or just misreading of your own figures, or someone else's crabby handwriting, can creep in. Similarly I find that I need to be careful when using a laser rangefinder that I take the measurement between the right points (it's easier to get it wrong than many non-laser users would think), but whilst they are (use correctly) more accurate than any tape once you have a measure the same translation errors can occur. Every time a measurement is transferred between media (e.g. tape to paper, paper to CAD, CAD drawing to machine scale or different tape measure, etc) there is the risk of human error creeping in - the more times you transfer measurements, the greater the chance of an error occurring
I suppose that the old maxim of
"measure twice, cut once" still holds true