Did ya? Are you glad you did??

[JohnD]

Changed it for you.


So the NHS costs £1.8 billion a year.

What percentage of this do you ascribe to foreign miscreants who have never paid UK tax or NI (I.e. not migrants who are working here)?

When the NHS is sold off by the Tories, what do you think the true reason for its underfunding will be?

 

[JohnD]

When a billionaire tax-dodger's house catches fire, do we send our fire engines and crews?

Or do we tell him to call the Corps des Sapeurs-pompiers de Monaco?

Do we need a government that pays attention to billionaire tax dodgers and multinationals? Or is it enough to blame foreigners for our underfunded public services?

 

[Doppleganger]

On other news:

"Financial Secretary to the Treasury Mel Stride says... the analysis shows that "the outcomes for the proposed future EU and UK relationship would deliver a higher economic output than a no deal scenario."

He says a no deal Brexit would create lower economic activity "across all areas of the UK" than the the proposed deal.

Mr Stride says the analysis "shows the deal on the table is the best deal and honours the referendum".https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-parliaments-46346257

What he really meant is that "the Deal" is the better than "No Deal", and honours only the second referendum. But it is not better than another alternative.

 

[JohnD]

its being bankrupted by treating those from other countries

That isn't true. Where do you get this nonsense? The EDL website? Iain Smith?

 

[Notch7]

and honours only the second referendum

second referendum?

 

[JohnD]

we haven't had the third one yet.

 

[durhamplumber]

second referendum?

Have as many refs as you like,no more EU for UK.

 

[Yafo]

For those with difficulty of understanding

https://amp.lbc.co.uk/radio/present...r-gets-very-angry-when-james-obrien-corrects/


It really does sum up the issue !

 

[Notch7]

For those that love James O Brien:

 

[ban-all-sheds]

Your subsequent claim merely confuses and confounds your original complaint.

His "complaint" is just more racist rambling.

 

[SammyInnit]

For those that love James O Brien:

So James O Brien.

 

[Doppleganger]

It is true and I get it first hand from someone I am closely related to who deals with this every day. If you knew the amount of those with Hepatitis that are serving you up your food, you'd not eat a takeaway again. Nearly every pregnant women from one particular European country has it and I can tell you the common link is their partners all have tattoo's. They don't sterilise the needles in that country but don't take my word for it - put in an FOI request to the NHS asking that question. It costs a fortune to treat them alone.

I suggest you question the motivation and information from your informant. They appear to be as poorly informed as yourself.

"51% of maternal HCV infections were in UK-born women, and 22% in women from continental Europe" https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...en-in-the-uk/0E596383AAF4B334A78E4AC5EACBFDEB

I don't take your word for it. Is your assumption based on the amount of tattoos that European males have compared to the amount of tattoos UK males have? Have you undertaken a survey? please share the results with the forum.

If you have the information from a FOI request, why not share it with the forum?

 

[JohnD]

Come on motman, have you no answer?

its being bankrupted by treating those from other countries

That isn't true. Where do you get this nonsense? The EDL website? Iain Smith?

 

[Ian H]

"51% of maternal HCV infections were in UK-born women, and 22% in women from continental Europe" https://www.cambridge.org/core/jour...en-in-the-uk/0E596383AAF4B334A78E4AC5EACBFDEB

It’s not that hard to work out, even from your 18year old information.

Let pretend there are 1,000,000 women in England. 71% are UK born, 5% Europe born, the rest from elsewhere in the word.

The 710,000 UK born women contribute to 51% of those treated.

The 50,000 Europe born women contribute to 22% of those treated.

Based on that I reckon that the European born women are 9 or 10 times more likely to require treatment than UK born women.

Or have I worked that out wrong Doppleganger and John? Edited to be closer to the article figures.

 

[Doppleganger]

It’s not that hard to work out, even from your 18year old information.

Let pretend there are 1,000,000 women in England. 90% are UK born, 5% Europe born, 5% from elsewhere in the word.

The 900,000 UK born women contribute to 51% of those treated.

The 50,000 Europe born women contribute to 22% of those treated.

Based on that I reckon that the European born women are 9 or 10 times more likely to require treatment than UK born women.

Or have I worked that out wrong Doppleganger and John?

Sorry your interpretation is incorrect. The UK born, and the continental born women were already separated.
The article states clearly: "51% of ... UK-born women, and 22% in women from continental Europe"
The percentage of the population of the different groups has no bearing.