Your first two links I quickly scanned as don't have much time left but it gave me an idea of the content.. Both stories were threatening violence so they're not really relevant to this discussion so don't know why you spent so much time putting them up.. If someone is threatening violence then yes, it should of course be a criminal matter as someone will be scared, rightly so.
As for the homeless, of course it's bad. But you have to ask, why have they not been given a voice as strong as religious minorities have? Because of people like you. You banged on and on after brexit about the rise of racism and still do. You mentioned Harlow again just the other day. It's people like you who have pushed it to the front, which isn't a bad thing btw. And I suppose I should find it refreshing now that you seem to be so concerned about the homeless and football rivals and if they get some verbal abuse. I hope you continue your concern.
The woman with the bouncer wasn't threatening as far as I could tell in the video. She was expressing her (racist) opinion.
As I asked you, was the bouncer scared or threatened? You didn't answer. Was she inciting violence, hatred? No, she was being verbally abusive, the silly girl.
As I said, you've proved that there is no thing as freedom of speech. You are either done for threatening, abusive or insulting language or they are done for inciting hatred or violence. So I ask you, what's left? I am afraid I agree with EFL. It has got to the stage where people are very wary of voicing their opinions or being seen as racist even if have genuine concerns. Before you disagree entirely, I will say a few more words to you. Rotheram child abuse.
