Your point about the EU losing a major founder is a blatant deflection
Perhaps he meant 'funder'.
Your point about the EU losing a major founder is a blatant deflection
Due to this I also heard that plod may well be forming a new task force the alotmant task force
Move on.
I've included it in with the tactic number 6, "I was only joking".when I present the evidence they are, suddenly you don’t want discuss it.
Same difference.Perhaps he meant 'funder'.
I've included it in with the tactic number 6, "I was only joking".
They realise their argument doesn't hold water, they're embarrassed and they want you to gloss over their embarrassment and forget about it.
I don’t really think an article from green peace counts as evidence or that a ‘failure to guarantee’ something that hasn’t happened anyway counts either.You claimed UK are not lowering standards.
when I present the evidence they are, suddenly you don’t want discuss it.
The argument will only be done and dusted when Brexit supporters start being honest.
You may not value the evidence from Greenpeace, but that alone does not invalidate the evidence.I don’t really think an article from green peace counts as evidence
It illustrates an intent not to guarantee standards, despite claiming they would, which I think was Notch7's point.I don’t really think .... that a ‘failure to guarantee’ something that hasn’t happened anyway counts either.
I should have included the links to those quotes, they came from about different sources.I don’t really think an article from green peace counts as evidence or that a ‘failure to guarantee’ something that hasn’t happened anyway counts either.