He probably has a termination provision in his contract for bringing his club into disrepute.Don't conflate him being dropped (as part of investigation process) with him being summarily found guilty.
Blup
He probably has a termination provision in his contract for bringing his club into disrepute.Don't conflate him being dropped (as part of investigation process) with him being summarily found guilty.
He probably has a termination provision in his contract for bringing his club into disrepute.
Blup
These are businesses that proudly monetise their community ties and their family appeal, that style themselves as dream factories, their players as heroes. They are also institutions that hothouse young men on an industrial scale from an ever-younger age, a surrogate school, family, cultural home. And yet as the organisation The Three Hijabis stated last month in an open letter to the football industry, there is no identifiable structure of care here, just an ever more frantic dance of horror, blame and punishment.
“Solely focusing on the actions of individual players allows football clubs and institutions to evade accountability for the role they play in maintaining a culture of silence and impunity – a culture that enables these abuses of power and status in the first place,” the letter notes. “This is a structural issue that football must take responsibility for.”
Barney Ronay @the Guadrian
How is it the responsibility of football to monitor the activities of young men after they go on a night out, or what they get up to in their home?
Racism: it's up to football, they say. I'm surprised they haven't pinned migration and inflation on to the Premier League and told them to fix it.
You can hardly compare a footballer having a bad break-up with his girlfriend to the abhorrent actions of Jimmy Saville, surely."Suspension during investigation" is quite common. Not just for footballers.
Should a nurse suspected of murdering babies have been given the opportunity to murder some more, pending investigation?
Should Jimmy Saville have lost access to vulnerable people?
What about a bank employee suspected of embezzlement?
The best reason i can see
Three mice in a big clock?"There's none so blind as...."........how does the rest of it go?
However, I can very reasonably point out that it is very common to suspend people during an investigation, frequently on full pay.You can hardly compare a footballer having a bad break-up with his girlfriend to the abhorrent actions of Jimmy Saville, surely.
Seems to me to be a green light to any bint with an attitude to find this a good way to get back at any guy who decided he'd had his fill of a relationship.
Seems to me to be a green light to any bint with an attitude to find this a good way to get back at any guy who decided he'd had his fill of a relationship.
Not in these circumstances, no. A public figure will be under more scrutiny and be subject to opinions based on what they hear before the full facts are known. Most people will automatically assume it's the blokes fault. I'm sure someone will provide statistics to back it up. I'd rather wait for the verdict in a court of law.However, I can very reasonably point out that it is very common to suspend people during an investigation, frequently on full pay.
Do you think that is wrong?
Funnily enough politicians are usually exempt from that policy"Suspension during investigation" is quite common.