Evidence found - they've been doing the vaccine injections wrongly?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Justin Passing said:
Numbers.
Campbells next video is about USA and not interesting.
But at the end he gives the Danish doc's numbers
Start around 18 minutes
2.4x not 3x, but significant.
Click to expand...

But, you have to look at the starting position in this study. Heart disease rates vary hugely across countries, and Norway had a lower rate of heart disease and heart failure than Sweden before covid or its vaccines came along.

BMJ say more research needed before people start panicking and changing the way injections are given.
 
JP_ said:
and Norway had a lower rate of heart disease and heart failure than Sweden before covid or its vaccines came along.
Click to expand...

I though Campbell used Norway and Denmark

death norway v danemark.jpg


Sweden's value is 58.27
 
Sponsored Links
Godwasaplasterer said:
, it’s genuinely been forced into their heads if they don’t get vaccinated they’ll end up in hospital.
Click to expand...

I don't bother to repeat myself especially on garbage like that. They are not forcing that into anybodies head. The message they are giving is entirely different.
 
Justin, how about shortening your posts? I can't get through them and I'll bet nobody else reads them all the way through.

Less is more. Look after yourself, go out and get some fresh air.
 
IT Minion said:
That's a letter. Not a paper.
Click to expand...

Dig some more. I found what I think they meant (see in the transcript) but the text was only viewable 'by professionals'. I didn't record the link.

I have found a BMJ article comparing Danish records with other countries, which suggests(only suggests, no analysis) the period between injections can correlate with the different figures.
Anyone who knows what he's doing and is honest, would look for all possible factors for correlation. Can't believe a guy with as many papers (782??) under his belt, would be so foolish as not to do all that in the standard accepted ways. The chi sq tests he refers to should be able to establish causation within accepted limits.
Maybe he fudged it, but it seems unlikely?
If he did, or is being economical with the truth, he's being a clown and has taken Campbell in. If that's true I'll edit Campbell's Wikipedia entry - though someone will doubtless beat me to it.

He refers here in the transcript:
[
have you been collecting data on
the
problems with myocarditis in denmark
compared to other countries now yeah i
did it
as a couple of months ago i looked at
the novitian data and the danish data
and
in both
the countries there are
very rare side effects of this kind but
it is about three times more frequent in
norway than in denmark and as a
statistical significant i did a key (he means chi, presumably)
square it says they need to
statistically
different
and
that has just been published i think it
was yesterday two days ago i saw a
paper in british medical journal from
denmark
looking at all the myocarditis
pericarditis
regard we found in denmark
and still it's very rare... ]
 
Last edited:
another thing, which I have not looked into, is that with limited data (he says so in that transcript) unusually large differences might be seen, but with more data (which the BMJ said was needed) these differences might vanish as the statistics become more meaningful.

The bottom line is, again, over 8 billion vaccines, and no significant increase in death.
 
He's quoting from about 48000 vaccines (from a particular period if I remember the chat properly), which is probably significant.
WIthout the source data, which I can't find, of course it's "to be looked into".
JP_ said:
The bottom line is, again, over 8 billion vaccines, and no significant increase in death.
Click to expand...

How is that a bottom line? Increase over what?

JP_ said:
another thing, which I have not looked into, is that with limited data (he says so in that transcript) unusually large differences might be seen, but with more data (which the BMJ said was needed) these differences might vanish as the statistics become more meaningful.
Click to expand...
Everybody knows that - it's what the statistical testing mentioned deals with.


I've anonymously put an objection on the reply to his video saying it's
fake news, to try to elicit proper sources. We'll see if he responds, if the comment doesn't get lost/buried..
 
Last edited:
If it was in fact a letter, not a paper, any crackpot can write one.

The following edition is likely to carry responses commenting on it.
 
There has already been several medical responses saying that its all nonsense.
 
JohnD said:
If it was in fact a letter, not a paper, any crackpot can write one.

The following edition is likely to carry responses commenting on it.
Click to expand...
Yes that's been said. There is however reference to a paper. Keep up.
You don't have to write inane childish stuff on your rounds...
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top