are these compulsory in utility rooms or W/c's?
So it does, thanks for putting me right! Been using the old version, must keep up . Couldn’t find the bit about a utility only if a sink is fitted, have you got a reference?A w/c now also requires an extractor even if a window is fitted.
Utility only needs one if a sink is fitted.
utility room: a room containing a sink or other feature which may reasonably be expected to produce water vapour in significant quantities
for sanitary accomodation only, as an alternative, the purge ventillation provisions (windows) given in Appendix B can be used where security is not an issue
So red herring then; having a sink doesn’t define weather or not it’s a utility room! If you have a washing m/c &/or tumble drier that produce water vapour but no sink it’s still --- a utility room & you will need an extractor fan.utility room; a room containing a sink or other feature which may reasonably be expected to produce water vapour in significant quantities
So let’s get this straight then; the ODPM in their infinite wisdom update the regs. (Document F 2006) table 1.1a which would seem to indicate you must now fit an extract fan in a w/c. They then bury a statement in the text which refers to Appendix B which further specifies you can use a window instead of an extract fan.i also note;
for sanitary accomodation only, as an alternative, the purge ventillation provisions (windows) given in Appendix B can be used where security is not an issue
Not sure that's right Richard. ADF 1.5 refers to 'Extract' ventilation whereas appendix B refers to 'Purge' ventilation. These are different things.
As far as I am aware, mechanical extract ventilation is always required to WCs whether purge ventilation is available or not.
Since earlier this year we ask for them in wc/s regardless of window/purge ventilation and only ask for one in utility rooms with a sink , as I said before. This may be interpreted in various ways with regs etc but thats my rule of thumb if you want a completion certificate from me
Richard C";p="1086527 said:Are you a BI? Since when does “rule of thumb” or personal interpretation have anything to do with compliance & enforcement of Building Regs ! The BR’s are written & intended as a National Standard (except Scotland) & LABC’s cannot just interpret them as they feel fit. I had assumed if there were any “interpretation issues” then guidance is sought from a central standards authority, is there one? Surely any misinterpretation would be shot down in flames if someone seeks a higher opinion or goes to appeal?
Bear in mind that the approved documents are not the building regs, they are just an acceptable robust method of complying with the regs and are definitely open to interpretation
Is that really correct ? If so, that’s a complete revelation to me! So where exactly does one get hold of copies of the definitive "Building Regulations" & what's the point of having "Approved Documents" if they don't reflect the regulations!Bear in mind that the approved documents are not the building regs, they are just an acceptable robust method of complying with the regs and are definitely open to interpretation
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local