Farmers on the march

Cut our cloth
Why?

Most other Western countries have far better standards of living for the vast majority.

The reason is because of wealth inequality


8 million people on NHS waiting lists is what we should accept, we must “cut our cloth”



No more housing thousands of foreign men in 4* luxury
Nobody here invited them to come here by small boat.

As yet you’ve provided no solution to solving the issue.
 
Sponsored Links

The BBC's fact-checking service has come under scrutiny after it deleted a statement backing Labour's claims in their inheritance tax raid on farmers.

The BBC's fact-checking service has come under scrutiny after it deleted a statement backing Labour's claims in their inheritance tax raid on farmers.

BBC Verify said the Government's figures about the number of farms affected by the policy were "likely" to be right.

But the corporation has since deleted its backing of the claim that only 500 farms a year will be affected by the policy from its website amid a bias row after Sir Keir Starmer trumpeted the BBC piece.

Shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew told the Daily Mail: "Taxpayers pay for the BBC to interrogate facts, not mindlessly parrot Government lines.

"These are highly contested statistics on a policy which may have a profound impact on prices in the shops, Britain's food security and rural life.
 
Yes. The highly educated bbc also made the mistake of forgetting to convert hectares to acres when working out values.
 
It's possible that there will not be as many ruined farmers as Clarkson pretends.

Instead, there will be fewer billionaires dodging tax by pretending to be hereditary farmers.
It’s possible you might do some research and educate yourself. Unlikely though.
 
Sponsored Links
If @pcaouolte chooses to show me his accounting records, and I carry out some site visits and interviews, I could probably get quite a good idea.

Make a note to ask your accountant to tell you what "profit" means.

Write down the ten most popular examples.

I will ignore the possibility that your question was serious, because it it so ludicrous for you to pretend that profits can't be manipulated.
So no evidence then. Just more gum flapping about millionaires dodging tax.
 
Yes. The highly educated bbc also made the mistake of forgetting to convert hectares to acres when working out values.
Its what you get when the bbc employs armies of autocue readers and media study graduates, and dismantles its once respected foreign correspondent network.

The BBC's fact-checking service has come under scrutiny after it deleted a statement backing Labour's claims in their inheritance tax raid on farmers.

The BBC's fact-checking service has come under scrutiny after it deleted a statement backing Labour's claims in their inheritance tax raid on farmers.

BBC Verify said the Government's figures about the number of farms affected by the policy were "likely" to be right.

But the corporation has since deleted its backing of the claim that only 500 farms a year will be affected by the policy from its website amid a bias row after Sir Keir Starmer trumpeted the BBC piece.

Shadow culture secretary Stuart Andrew told the Daily Mail: "Taxpayers pay for the BBC to interrogate facts, not mindlessly parrot Government lines.

"These are highly contested statistics on a policy which may have a profound impact on prices in the shops, Britain's food security and rural life.
The Daily Fail fact checking the Beeb is a red flag in itself. This is more balanced:

To quote:
“Even at the lowest estimate, Steve Reed is saying 500 farms a year will be affected by this change. This will still be over 20,000 farms impacted by the caps over a generation (40 years.)”

The bbc should grow a pair and resist right wing media weaponising information.
 
C4 backed the govs claim as well but pointed out that the missing element was how much farmers actually earn. They used the same valuation survey that the gov did. Also worked one case out. Single owner so question was how affordable £1xk for 10 years was. ;) can't remember the x value.

They gave shadow lady a bit of a hard time. She wouldn't accept the valuations.
 
A lot of sales are not via open market, so the valuations are unlikely to be anything more than an estimate.

Sounds like it will create a whole industry of farm surveyors carrying out pointless assessments, like we have with EPC certification companies on house sales.

The government are focusing on the small number impacted each year, missing the point that around 25-35% have a rope around their necks and this will increase as values rise.

Anyone arguing they are millionaires getting tax breaks. Needs to consider that the asset value is meaningless if you simply can’t ever sell.

Much better to defer the tax until point of sale. This would force out the investors and avoid punishing genuine farmers.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top