- Joined
- 28 Apr 2004
- Messages
- 7,851
- Reaction score
- 746
- Country
It will be interesting to compare your examplesBlimey get boozed up
And assault some one and you would get a lesser fine than some of the fines given out for speeding offences
It will be interesting to compare your examplesBlimey get boozed up
And assault some one and you would get a lesser fine than some of the fines given out for speeding offences
No, they really can. It is contingent on a little common sense, education and intelligence. Quite beyond the gentleman on the Clapham omnibus, let alone forum idiots.How can "stats" tell you if a particular crime is on the up or going down? They can only tell you how many arrests / convictions / cautions / reported incidents there are, surely?
I have the perception that drug use is on the up. You can constantly smell weed in most towns and cities. But according to stats. It’s only slightly on the up tick and nothing like what it was in the 90s
The same old duffers conveniently 'don't remember' ever being kids themselves whilst simultaneously blaming present day kids for all of our ills.Don't remember there being a dope farm on every street in the 90s.
Crikey, you aint half spent some stupid money going there.My speeding ticket was incurred whilst travelling to the festival
Of speed
It isn't.Hmm, stats. I can't believe that weed was more prevalent 30 years ago. Nowadays, like you, I'm smelling it everywhere - in the street, walking past houses and cars. Two scuzzers in regulation grey trackromper suits were sitting in the middle of local precinct openly smoking it last summer. Don't remember there being a dope farm on every street in the 90s. Maybe it was different supply in resin form, but it's everywhere now. Police have lost the battle.
You brought yourself in.What made you bring this irrelevant nugget into the conversation?
You brought yourself in.
Not when the statistics are fiddled or just not collected.No, they really can. It is contingent on a little common sense, education and intelligence. Quite beyond the gentleman on the Clapham omnibus, let alone forum idiots.
you can read it here:How can "stats" tell you if a particular crime is on the up or going down? They can only tell you how many arrests / convictions / cautions / reported incidents there are, surely?
The same old duffers conveniently 'don't remember' ever being kids themselves whilst simultaneously blaming present day kids for all of our ills.
Incredible what old duffers are capable of forgetting.
Hell of a jump since I was a lad in people on the phone while driving, too..........Then we have those who died, who were tested for drugs. A jump of 50%.
You can't accuse the validity of statistics per se if people are simply lying.Not when the statistics are fiddled or just not collected.
Blup