I think you meant wandering. I know, it's really terrible, isn't it? You can't drive down a motorway these days without people wandering all over the place.
Maybe 'cos a person isn't wandering on the motorway but trying to commit suicide by car. Whereas animals may wander onto the motorway in the true sense of the word. But, in reality, I think it's your interpretation.
He may not be the main suspect. You're not aware of the full investigation so it's your supposition. He's someone being investigated on suspicion of....who is presumed innocent until proven guilty, never mind being charged.
Trial by Mickymoody, perhaps.
Thats tragic of course and the dog should obviously be put down immiediately in a humane way.
(If you were on this forum long enough you would already know peoples opinions and would hear and not have to make ignorant comments)
As for the owner?
Such dogs and people, dont deserve to be treated humanly, although I suppose you will retort with an equally ignorant and ill informed comment as your last one!
Such dogs and people, dont deserve to be treated humanly, although I suppose you will retort with an equally ignorant and ill informed comment as your last one!
Pits bulls savaging children have nothing to do with this thread so why bring the subject up?
Other than to take a pop at people who like dogs.
And what exactly do you mean by "dog lover types"?
If you want my honest opinion I think both the dog and owner should be treated humanely.
You sound as though you don't like dogs. Thats alright of course.
There will always be tragic occurences between children and dogs just as we will always see dogs treated cruelly and hung from bridges.
Would you rather we had a world without dogs?
Of course that would mean a child would never again by savaged by one and I would never see a clip on U tube ever again off a dog being skinned alive so it would be like " killing two birds with the one stone" for want of a better phrase.