Following on from this thread
A recent House of Lords ruling has now defined a fire door closer (and by implication - fire door) as "work equipment"
The Lords held that the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) was intended to apply to all equipment regardless of whether it was integrated into the structure of the installation or not.
This differs with current HSE guidance, which indicates the definition of work equipment would not cover permanently installed systems.
In the previous thread, there was debate on whether a fire door was work equipment. It was not at that time, but is now.
So there you have it.
The case in question is Peter Spencer-Franks v Kellogg Brown & Root and others [2008]
A recent House of Lords ruling has now defined a fire door closer (and by implication - fire door) as "work equipment"
The Lords held that the Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998 (PUWER) was intended to apply to all equipment regardless of whether it was integrated into the structure of the installation or not.
This differs with current HSE guidance, which indicates the definition of work equipment would not cover permanently installed systems.
In the previous thread, there was debate on whether a fire door was work equipment. It was not at that time, but is now.
So there you have it.
The case in question is Peter Spencer-Franks v Kellogg Brown & Root and others [2008]