Yes, one could try that, but it would probably have to be done 'on the bench', since both pots are within the fan casing. If, with the timer set to a long run-on period, in the presence of 'moderate' ambient humidity, one turned the humidistat pot 'right down' (so that the fan came on) and then immediately 'right up', one might expect/hope that if the timed run-on was not linked to humidistat operation, the fan would go off very soon, whereas if humidistat and timer were linked, the fan would continue running for the full timer period.Yes its a fair point. It could be designed that way. ... I guess if one wanted to know you could fiddle with the 2 pots, and it maybe possible to work it out from that.
However, as I implied, the catch with this is that there could be substantial hysteresis (or just delays) in the humidistat operation - so it might take a long time for the fan to go off after the humidistat pot had been 'turned right up', even if the timer were not implicated. If the fan went off immediately the humidistat pot was turned right up, that would be pretty conclusive (that timer was not being triggered) but in the other scenario, one couldn't really be certain.
Kind Regards, John