Anyone else noticed how this forum is an excellent example of Freud's 'therories'? - i.e. all of our issues are revolved around repressed sexual ideas. (in short: Can I eat it?, can it eat me?, can I sh@g it?, will it sh@g me?)
toffee said:do you agree with freud?
toffee said:do you agree with freud?
toffee said:I believe that sexual tension definately governs much of life.
On simple levels and complex levels.
certainly when looking at judicial results.
Physical looks can have good and bad results when looking at for example employment success.
Good looking people get preferential treatment etc etc though they can get bullied through envy.
but freud... I feel is flawed.
toffee said:I believe that sexual tension definately governs much of life.
On simple levels and complex levels.
certainly when looking at judicial results.
Physical looks can have good and bad results when looking at for example employment success.
Good looking people get preferential treatment etc etc though they can get bullied through envy.
but freud... I feel is flawed.
toffee said:but freud... I feel is flawed.
joe-90 said:He gave up psychotherapy and created a range of power tools. (not that type Toffee)
Is that not the down fall of a human ,They start of with a theory then try and find evidence to back it up and if they look hard enough they will find it.Once this evidence is presented to the wider world it is accepted ,until obiously someone else comes along with their theory and evidence to disprove the previous theory and so it goes ontoffee said:yes, he had extremist views which unfortunately diluted a lot of credible findings.
I feel he had blinkered views, based on personal views and upbringing and what he wanted to find.
joe-90 said:He gave up psychotherapy and created a range of power tools. (not that type Toffee)
Then he gave up power tools and became Liberal MP for somewhere in London.