Question. Do you consider AC RCDs unsafe?
I will accept that you wouldn’t install one in a new install. However does that mean every home, building etc that has them fitted, is now unsafe?
That's an almost philosophical question which we often debate here.
The simple, and obvious, answer is that they are no less safe then they were when they were installed or at any time subsequently.
However, views as to what is 'safe', even legal, change over time. For a start, in context, there was a time when electrical installations without any RCDs were considered safe enough to be allowed, and the requirement for them in relation to various types of circuit has only gradually increased over many years - so there have been plenty of times in recent years when the absence of RCD protection for some circuit was considered 'safe enough' then, but not now.
More generally, in my youth, any number of electrical things which would today be considered 'totally unsafe' were very widely deployed, hence presumably regarded as 'adequately safe' at the time (e.g. light switched whose covers could easily be unscrewed by hand, revealing life parts, but many many more examples. The first car I owned was considered 'adequately safe for the time', even though it did not have, or even have provision for, seat belts.
For me, personally, this issue of Type AC RCDs is even more difficult because, as I have said very many times, I have yet to succeed in finding enough 'chapter and verse' to convince me that they really are a significant problem with them (hence 'unsafe' by today's standards). Although that means that I remain a bit sceptical, I nevertheless accept what the regulations now require and hence, as you have seen, 'defend' that situation.
Even more generally, there are plenty of laws that I don't really agree with, but am obliged to comply with!
Kind Regards, John