well im not here to stick up for bg, god knows if they were any good, i would still be working for them, but i and my colleagues on bg, were conscientious and i just want to put the record straight, the customer got a safety check, which includes the 4 electrical checks and check fuse rating, burner pressure. visual check check inside combustion cover, performance test to 0.004, and at that time corgi was asking for 0.008. walk the system, bleed the rads. the customer is asked if they know of any faults, perhaps a rad not working as it should. now if the safety check threw up any problems, those problems were fixed, and if it didnt pass the performance test, the result was acted on, the service was done. the engineer knows its a waste of time leaving something, cos you only going to get called back to do it at a later date. im not saying every bg engineer was like that, but the bad ones soon got found out because of the recalls to their work. the insinuation was that the bg engineer does not do a good job. this is erroneous in my view.