- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
He really is starting to talk a load of twaddle.
He wants to remove the child benefit of a single mum earning £50k - but wants to continuing paying a couple both earning £40K (£80K combined).
It's not going to happen George, not this year, next year or any other year.
He also reckons he's going to cap benefits at £26K (why not a years worth of the minimum wage?) and make 25,000 homeless (even though the Government has a legal duty to house any family with kids).
It's not going to happen George. Live in the real world mate.
Oh sorry, he can't - he comes from one of the UK's richest families and is set to inherit a billion quid.
Why do we elect his type? He's clueless as to the real world.
He wants to remove the child benefit of a single mum earning £50k - but wants to continuing paying a couple both earning £40K (£80K combined).
It's not going to happen George, not this year, next year or any other year.
He also reckons he's going to cap benefits at £26K (why not a years worth of the minimum wage?) and make 25,000 homeless (even though the Government has a legal duty to house any family with kids).
It's not going to happen George. Live in the real world mate.
Oh sorry, he can't - he comes from one of the UK's richest families and is set to inherit a billion quid.
Why do we elect his type? He's clueless as to the real world.