C
Captain Nemesis
No - its probably just normal people, not those obsessed with the notion of "filth".Yeah It's definitely JUST you
No - its probably just normal people, not those obsessed with the notion of "filth".Yeah It's definitely JUST you
I checked mine - its there.Checked my primary email, mobile number and landline -
Good news — no pwnage found!
However, my old talktalk / Tiscali address ..
Oh no — pwned!
Pwned in 11 data breaches and found 1 paste (subscribe to search sensitive breaches)
Surely if you use an email client to access your Gmail you would expect it to map Gmails "spam" onto its "junk" (if thats what it calls it), trash to trash, etc?
It would be a pretty useless client if it did not replicate folder structures, contents, and to a large extent names.
1) It would be a pretty useless client which used POP in preference to IMAP.
1) It would be a pretty useless client which used POP in preference to IMAP.
2) It would be a pretty useless POP client which chose to obfuscate the structure of the mail server
so on a daily basis I have to select these unwanted messages and delete them
All I want to achieve is delete my present email address and replace it with a different one so as to rid myself of the filth I am getting inundated with
IMAP has several advantages over POP1) It would be a pretty useless client which used POP in preference to IMAP.
Why?
Id rather have consistent views of server-side mail from a multiplicity of clients and to use alternative backup solutions for all the data I care about, not just photos.Google offer 15gb for free but that space is shared with your camera roll/etc. If you have 10 Gb of photos from your phone, you will soon use up the remaining 5gb in emails. In those circumstances it might make sense to use POP to store the emails on your PC and for your client to tell it to delete emails from the server after X days.
Same here.I have gmail. I pretty much never look in junk. Only if I am expecting something and it's not in my inbox.