it would seem PCR testing is down 44% over the last week or so.
which makes the argument "we are over the peak" rather unproven
Would that not be because there is less people with symptoms?
it would seem PCR testing is down 44% over the last week or so.
which makes the argument "we are over the peak" rather unproven
It says down 14.4% on the ONS board - from about a million a day - or is that not "PCR tests"?it would seem PCR testing is down 44% over the last week or so.
which makes the argument "we are over the peak" rather unproven
No they aren't all PCR tests. If you click on 'all testing data' it breaks it down.It says down 14.4% on the ONS board - from about a million a day - or is that not "PCR tests"?
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/
If this site is not giving accurate numbers, then what can we do?
Are you on Twitter again
It could be, but it isn't certain. For example people might not be getting tested for symptoms as much.Would that not be because there is less people with symptoms?
Yes, so what is the point of Notch only quoting the PCR test figure?No they aren't all PCR tests. If you click on 'all testing data' it breaks it down.
Ok. Does that mean the other tests are pointless?There were 368,086 PCR tests out of 797,775 recorded/reported on 27-07-2021.
The numbers of tests performed are probably highly accurate, but you do have to interpret them correctly.
Again ok, but cases fell 36% this week.A week ago it was 405,005 and a week before that it was 408,957. So down 10%. What that could mean is worth a separate post because the simple assumption of a 10% drop in cases detected isn't necessarily true.
I'm sure Notch can tell you.Yes, so what is the point of Notch only quoting the PCR test figure?
No.Ok. Does that mean the other tests are pointless?
They did, but that 10% won't be a representative reduction. All the screening tests, for example at hospitals for staff and patients, will be continuing without any changes. So that 10% is going to be a much larger proportion of the testing for symptomatic cases.Again ok, but cases fell 36% this week.
it would seem PCR testing is down 44% over the last week or so.
which makes the argument "we are over the peak" rather unproven
Some might say this could also be because the number of tests being carried out in the UK has been excessive and this just brings it back into balance.Would that not be because there is less people with symptoms?
It's a good point but do they test with PCR tests? I thought they mostly use lateral flow and then PCR if they get a positive.School staff won't necessarily be testing twice a week during the summer holidays. That will bring the testing numbers down.
I teach a little in a school as a volunteer, in retirement. Teachers probably all know that if you have a positive lateral flow test ( and they will have a dozen of those floating about) you're 99+% going to test positive on a PCR (Many of the false-positive LFTs are where a kid puts something on the test to fake it - they all know how). And, once you do a PCR and get a +ve it legally enforces you to do things. Most experience symptoms fading away in a couple of days, so jokes circulate about not wanting a PCR test in the holidays.It's a good point but do they test with PCR tests? I thought they mostly use lateral flow and then PCR if they get a positive.
it came from hereIt says down 14.4% on the ONS board - from about a million a day - or is that not "PCR tests"?
https://coronavirus.data.gov.uk/
If this site is not giving accurate numbers, then what can we do?
Are you on Twitter again
They would be wrong. Positivity rates have been above 10% for a while now, that's well beyond the point where you're under testing.Some might say this could also be because the number of tests being carried out in the UK has been excessive and this just brings it back into balance.
Of course it could also mean that deaths with the 'virus' as opposed to from the 'virus' were over exaggerated previouslyit would seem PCR testing is down 44% over the last week or so.
which makes the argument "we are over the peak" rather unproven