Freddie said:n case you unaware a state of war exists in Britain which has been declared by the terrorists on you and yours and me and mine....................
.........and from what i see on other forums and the radio tele etc etc in opinion polls etc etc the British public welcome and relish this shoot first policy and in the words of one man from another web site------its about time the goverment changed its policy from nicking speeding drivers to fighting terrorism by eliminating them.
oilman said:Freddie said:n case you unaware a state of war exists in Britain which has been declared by the terrorists on you and yours and me and mine....................
Wrong. They are unlikely to be interested in such personal trivia at my level or your level, there are bigger fish to fry.
.........and from what i see on other forums and the radio tele etc etc in opinion polls etc etc the British public welcome and relish this shoot first policy and in the words of one man from another web site------its about time the goverment changed its policy from nicking speeding drivers to fighting terrorism by eliminating them.
Thank you for amplifying my earlier post that the "British public" in this case are no more than a bunch of uncivilised bigots. This is the precursor to civil war, and I will be one of the targets, along with kendor, since we are able to THINK, and so are a threat to the rule of the mob..
oilman said:Well demonstrated gentlemen, everyone can see you for the danger you pose, and as for you Freddie, Ken Livingstone summed up our apology for democracy when he said in the early 1990s, "If it was important, you wouldn't be allowed to vote". (I've paraphrased a bit here because I'm sure I must have made an error in the exact words).
oilman said:When have I ever used the phrase "the great unwashed". What I have countered in these threads is the profession of violence against a general group as a result of the actions of a few, and unfortunately most people, including the British, will follow like sheep. Hitler demonstrated that.
The problem with this retribution type approach is that generally when the proponents run out of one target, they look for another. That's why it's a threat. It's as well to remember there are plenty of people with diverse views about what the target should be, and you might be one shch target. So stop feeling so got at and righteous that I must be on someone elses side if I don't appear to be on yours, when you advocate a shooting policy, you also might be the recipient of a bullet.
..........Now we have armed lunatics on the street killing us, and you try to stop the security forces killing them before they can kill us again by snide and rubbishing their heroic actions.
Freddie said:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4706913.stm
Slogger said:nice one
shoot to kill on sight policy for these scum
about time too
time to do some rounding up of this guys known associates
hats off to the officers involved in this and i hope some sort of medal as they well deserved it
now alll we need is a cuppla dozen 500 lb bombs put into some of them mosks in pakistan ( training camps )
Richardp said:Slogger said:nice one
shoot to kill on sight policy for these scum
about time too
time to do some rounding up of this guys known associates
hats off to the officers involved in this and i hope some sort of medal as they well deserved it
now alll we need is a cuppla dozen 500 lb bombs put into some of them mosks in pakistan ( training camps )
"He looked absolutely petrified and then he sort of tripped, but they were hotly pursuing him, [they] couldn't have been any more than two or three feet behind him at this time and he half tripped and was half pushed to the floor and the policeman nearest to me had the black automatic pistol in his left hand. "He held it down to the guy and unloaded five shots into him."