You weren't aware that it was reported in other media outlets. I guess you didn't look into it too carefully then.I guess you don't do irony, Brigadier.Enough people must give a toss, otherwise the newspaper wouldn't have bothered printing the story (nor other media outlets also reporting it).
Noseall was suggesting that the majority of newspaper readers are naive and gullible, I assumed.
As long as they don't think about where their meat came from, they don't give a toss.
That's what happens when you assume, RH - I was commenting on the story, not on Noseall's post. Which you wrongly assumed to be the case.
What did you think about the other nine stories?
"Bowood Lamb is the 10th slaughterhouse in which we have filmed undercover since January 2009"
Did you give a toss?
You weren't aware that it was reported in other media outlets. I guess you didn't look into it too carefully then.
If you think the UK meat market is without pain and suffering toward the animals then you are a blinkered townie.I am sure that the slaughter of apple sauce and Yorkshire puds is painless.
Good for you JBR, everyone is entitled to an opinion.Without entering into the inevitable arguments on here, I'd like to state my opinion.
It must have been the ambiguity of your comment, and me reading the negativity in there:You weren't aware that it was reported in other media outlets. I guess you didn't look into it too carefully then.
How on earth did you come to that (incorrect) conclusion, based on what I had written?
It was your mistake, it couldn't have been mine!Enough people must give a toss, otherwise the newspaper wouldn't have bothered printing the story (nor other media outlets also reporting it).
It must have been the ambiguity of your comment, and me reading the negativity in there:You weren't aware that it was reported in other media outlets. I guess you didn't look into it too carefully then.
How on earth did you come to that (incorrect) conclusion, based on what I had written?
It was your mistake, it couldn't have been mine!Enough people must give a toss, otherwise the newspaper wouldn't have bothered printing the story (nor other media outlets also reporting it).
But I am glad to see that you are now being ambiguous,rather than the one-sided comments that you used to portray.
I'm sure you'd agree, Brigadier, that with some posters, not yourself included I should add, but with some, one is forced to look for things that aren't there, but should be.It must have been the ambiguity of your comment, and me reading the negativity in there:You weren't aware that it was reported in other media outlets. I guess you didn't look into it too carefully then.
How on earth did you come to that (incorrect) conclusion, based on what I had written?
It was your mistake, it couldn't have been mine!Enough people must give a toss, otherwise the newspaper wouldn't have bothered printing the story (nor other media outlets also reporting it).
But I am glad to see that you are now being ambiguous,rather than the one-sided comments that you used to portray.
Nah - you're just looking for things that just aren't there; a habit that you just can't shake
But there are more than enough looking for an excuse to attack the religious group they hate..
Entertainingly, some, such as Norcon, criticise Muslim ritual slaughter of stunned animals, but have no criticism whatsoever of Jewish ritual slaughter of unstunned animals.
If you think the UK meat market is without pain and suffering toward the animals then you are a blinkered townie.I am sure that the slaughter of apple sauce and Yorkshire puds is painless.
You watch too much tele. Babe was just a movie. They don't really ask animals to obey rather, the animals are 'encouraged'.
They don't exactly go out of their way to be liked or even intergrate, do they? I can't think of any other religion in The UK that goes out of it's way to court opprobrium.
They don't exactly go out of their way to be liked or even intergrate, do they? I can't think of any other religion in The UK that goes out of it's way to court opprobrium.
You're quite correct, of course. This is especially apparent in areas and cities where they have all but taken over (Bradford, Birmingham, etc.), where all the women look like black pillar boxes and all the men walk around sporting nightshirts. That says a lot. At least it says to me, "This is now my country and I'll show it by wearing what I would have been wearing in the country of my antecedents".
Nearly spat me teeth out at this one. So says the boyo who dredges up the same old diatribe again and again and again and again and again and again......As has already been discussed on other threads,