- Joined
- 8 Apr 2004
- Messages
- 386
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
I think whoever designed meters is a twonk. Would it be too hard to have tails that could be removed, and everywhere else sealed, so that one doesn't have to breach any seals. That way it could be arranged so electricity cannot be stolen, and one can disconnect the supply (they could hold the cables in with some sort of screw you adjust to loosen the tails, therefore, if you use an insulated screw driver, it should not be too unsafe for anyone unqualified.)
Now that's my design. Instead, we have the service fuse before the meter , a meter that has to have its seal broken , etc, making it not only harder for people to do their jobs and home improvements, but also making it harder for the electricity companies to check nobody's been getting free electricity. Plus, when somebody steals, who ends up out of pocket, the REC or the supplier? Does the REC force the supplier to make compensation,, I mean, if the supplier reads the meter, notices the seals are broken but doesn't do anything about it, surely the REC pays the bill for that electricity?
Now that's my design. Instead, we have the service fuse before the meter , a meter that has to have its seal broken , etc, making it not only harder for people to do their jobs and home improvements, but also making it harder for the electricity companies to check nobody's been getting free electricity. Plus, when somebody steals, who ends up out of pocket, the REC or the supplier? Does the REC force the supplier to make compensation,, I mean, if the supplier reads the meter, notices the seals are broken but doesn't do anything about it, surely the REC pays the bill for that electricity?