It not just the cost effective question - it's the overall energy in/energy out question as well. Seems hard to believe that the small energy savings of the B&Q generator justify the energy and environmental impact of producing the thing in the first place.tim west said:There are replies that state it's all a waste of time as it's not cost effective but surely cost is not paramount here but everyone doing their bit to save energy where possible (ignoring globalwarming for the moment and energy wastage, whether true or not) Resources are being plundered and if everyone did their little bit then big savings could be had in use of resources surely?