Totally unworkable, what if the parents don't want their adult "child" to move back (notwithstanding the abusive household issue) the parents can't be forced to accept them back.
.
The whole point is that these 16-25 year-olds don't immediately become a burden on the state.
They will learn the concept of fending for themselves. There will be the private sector to rent from if they can't stay at home.
The added "bonus" is that parents will learn some parental responsibility and be responsible for their kids
If you knew how the current system worked then you would see how easy it is to play, and to get a council place. But people leaving school need to learn that they need to look after themselves and not rely on handouts and free housing all their lives
There are people, families who have been affected by the economic situation and have lost or will their home. People who have worked and not relied on the state. Now the waiting lists for social housing are massive - partly because of no past investment, but mainly because the housing is given to young people straight from school who have contributed nothing and are then trapped in this lifestyle
Likewise, people willing to try, willing to work and contribute are denied housing to give them a start, because its full of others doing nothing but constantly living off the state
It certainly is not simple, and there are many other social issues to address. But the main point is that young people should not think for a moment that they have a "right" to get a property and live off the state straight from school. And parents will also need to take responsibility for the kids they have
The welfare state has been looking after people for far too long, instead of its purpose of assisting them. People know that, and are playing it