the government dont have any plans to tackle the issueThats because behind many government plans to tackle the issue
the Rwanda plan wasnt designed to work, it only catered for a few hundred and it was a reciprocal arrangement
if the government actually wanted to reduce the number of asylum seekers here they could speed up the processing of existing claims of which there is a 200,000 backlog
WRONGthe so called "do gooders" turn up saying let them be, we love everyone who comes to our country, we should be welcoming more,
nobody has been saying "we should be welcoming more"
You mean legal experts following the lawnot to mention all the legal experts who use every trick in the book to actually try and stop the government when they actually do try and do something
the supreme court did not try and stop the government "trying to do something", the supreme court merely stopped the govt from breaking the law