I would tend to agree with you, either directly of indirectly I would hazard a guess that the vast majority of the planets energy comes from the sun. (I stress that is a guess though!)
As I said, we get about 173PW from the sun,
About 30% of the incoming solar radiation is reflected back into the terrestrial atmosphere by the earth; this is called the “albedo” of the earth, which is defined as the ratio between the reflected and incident radiation and denoted by a. The reflection is caused by various phenomena, such as backscattering (7%), reflection by clouds (17%), and reflection by the earth’s surface (6%). Then, about 19% of the incoming solar radiation is absorbed by the water vapor, dust, and ozone molecules present in the atmosphere, while about 4% is absorbed by clouds. The remaining 47% is absorbed by the earth.
About 76PW actually heats the Earths surface, and 22% of the incident extraterrestrial solar radiation, amounting to 40 PW, is consumed by the hydrological cycle (rain, evaporation etc), so all the lakes, and rivers etc. got there by this process.
If we used all the 76PW in solar panels at 20% efficiency, we would get 15PW, which would equate to about 1000 times what we consume now. At 3% growth, thats about the year 2240.
The intensity of geothermal heat is comparatively low with respect to solar energy intensity, namely ~0.1 W/m2 versus ~240 W/m2 for geothermal solar, respectively.
Put another way, the total solar energy available could be considered as 117PW
Geothermal - 0.044PW
Tidal - 0.003PW
But current consumption is about 0.015PW.
Of that 0.015PW, only a tiny fraction will be from solar energy directly (either PV or thermal)
Lots more info here:
http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rc...LMuqmm5xWqEvQmPKMs0dHkA&bvm=bv.56146854,d.d2k