- Joined
- 22 Dec 2021
- Messages
- 2,416
- Reaction score
- 339
- Country
I don't think you that understand the point you're trying to make yourself.Yeah yeah yeah, you keep on missing the point and stepping sideways.
If the rules were not set by those they benefit, they might be fairer, and easier to apply to all. That is point of this thread, to make them fairer they should be simpler, either you agree with that, or you don't.
That is the point of this thread, how to make taxation fairer. Not, how to legally avoid, and whether you have the resources to do so or not. Those resources are not commonly available.
I am in a financial postion where it is very beneficial for me to avoid paying tax. I cannot do that myself, I cannot possibly have that indepth a knowledge of our tax regime that I can avoid paying the levels of tax that would otherwise financially cripple me. I employ someone to do that on my behalf, & they don't work for nothink, they ain't cheap.
I do what I do, they do what they do & everybodys happy.
The average salary could not possibly justify paying for the level of financial advice that I enjoy. Is it this that you are saying is unfair?
I am in a financial postion that enables me to donate over £60k a year in charitable donations, money that would otherwise be forfeit in tax. I get that £60k in the chancellors coffers would help pay for all those things our tax money pays for, except my way gives ME a chance to direct it towards things that I find important.