Even though the full background wasn't public then, paying for pictures of a teenage young man is more than enough grounds to have withheld his pay rise. It may have been contractual, but they could have sacked him on the spot for gross misconduct. Linekker would have been. I think that Edwards was regarded as a kind of establishment type figure, and that protected him
Personal and confidential patient data? Definitely not, don't be stupid. When she worked from home, I wasn’t even allowed in the room when she was typing. Why do you ask - looking for something to weaponise, were you?
If I was a cynic, , I could easily argue that it is because the medical facilities in prisons are woefully inadequate.
Two sides (at least) to every tale.
In a letter to staff the BBC Chair Samir Shah says Edwards had "behaved in bad faith".
www.bbc.co.uk
Tell me this is a windup.. so they carry on paying Huw knowing he's a nonce and have now said 'err Huw now everyone knows we knew you were a nonce can you give back the money we were happily paying you until we got found out.
He has nothing to lose how about no fck off I'm already up to my neck in it.
And no I don't justify any of his disgusting behaviour.
I can see some slim angle for this if he protested his innocence to his employer and said he would fight to clear his name. Knowing all along that this was not the case.
I can’t see they have a claim though unless it was contractual.
I can see some slim angle for this if he protested his innocence to his employer and said he would fight to clear his name. Knowing all along that this was not the case.
I can’t see they have a claim though unless it was contractual.