ImPOTUS

[sooey]

Evidence please....

Phil Kline, who I've already linked to explains that side of things beautifully.
All about the six key swing states the Democrats targeted, about the way they targeted the largest cities in those states, about the hhalf a billion dollars of Zuckerberg money that was channelled into those areas in the months before the election.
About the numerous court cases the Democrats filed in the run up to the election to remove the restrictions on mail in balloting, using covid as the excuse to push through changes which were illegal as well as unconstitutional because they were done by the courts. The state legislature is the ONLY body that can change electoral law in each state.
About the massive amounts of fraudulent voting that the mail in balloting shorn of any meaningful safeguards enabled.
There is much more but as I said Phil Kline presents it all far better than I can, try looking at the evidence I've already given you links to, instead of parroting that show us the evidence mantra
That's what the mainstream have been saying while refusing access for the evidence to be examined, and refusing to allow the evidence that has been collected to be shown in court.

 

[Vinty]

Those who dismiss Trump supporters as fools are usually the same people who sneered at Brexiteers before the 2016 referendum.
Whatever your opinion of Trump almost half of those who voted in the Presidential election voted for Trump.
Those millions who voted for him haven't gone away, Trump made a fool of himself by refusing to concede that he lost the election, even with Trump now out of the picture the culture war in America will go on and will most likely intensify.

 

[Vinty]

.

 

[denso13]

The reason these figures can be given with confidence is because the 'steal' took place in the urban areas, where the most voters in the key states are, and where the most black voters are. Places like Detroit, Atlanta, etc. etc.

Biden got about 1,000 fewer votes than Clinton previously in Detroit, while Trump, got almost 5,000 more than last time.

In Philadelphia Biden got about 5,000 votes more than Clinton in 2016, while Trump is up 20,000 since the last time.

Any more evidence?

 

[noseall]

They said the same thing about Brexit

And they were right. It's much easier to con the stupid and the weak minded. Sorry, but those are the facts.

 

[denso13]

Phil Kline, who I've already linked to explains that side of things beautifully.

The exposed liar?

So no actual evidence then, just like the court cases.

 

[Vinty]

Phil Kline, who I've already linked to explains that side of things beautifully.
All about the six key swing states the Democrats targeted, about the way they targeted the largest cities in those states, about the hhalf a billion dollars of Zuckerberg money that was channelled into those areas in the months before the election.
About the numerous court cases the Democrats filed in the run up to the election to remove the restrictions on mail in balloting, using covid as the excuse to push through changes which were illegal as well as unconstitutional because they were done by the courts. The state legislature is the ONLY body that can change electoral law in each state.
About the massive amounts of fraudulent voting that the mail in balloting shorn of any meaningful safeguards enabled.
There is much more but as I said Phil Kline presents it all far better than I can, try looking at the evidence I've already given you links to, instead of parroting that show us the evidence mantra
That's what the mainstream have been saying while refusing access for the evidence to be examined, and refusing to allow the evidence that has been collected to be shown in court.

There was a big problem with postal ballots but i don't know if it was a big enough problem to swing the election in Bidens favour.
It is impossible to say whether all the postal votes were legitimate.
So we will never know.

 

[sooey]

The exposed liar?

So no actual evidence then, just like the court cases.

You seem to have problems with comprehension.
You seem to believe that the courts' refusal to allow evidence to be presented means that there is no evidence. Despite the fact that you have been told repeatedly where to find the mountains of evidence that there is.
It's very hard to argue with your stupidity, so I will just keep posting the links to the evidence that there is, and try my best to ignore the idiots.

 

[sooey]

There was a big problem with postal ballots but i don't know if it was a big enough problem to swing the election in Bidens favour.
It is impossible to say whether all the postal votes were legitimate.
So we will never know.

When you have numerous election watchers from both parties saying that there were mail in ballots in pristine condition, with no creases, meaning that they have never been folded and put in an envelope, and when the outer envelopes with the signatures are supposed to be kept to enable signature matching against the electoral register, and when you have election workers saying that many of the signatures were identical and written in the same pen.
And when you have experts like Jovan H Pulitzer saying that if he was allowed to examine those ballots he would be able to tell if they were made in China, if the person who printed them was right or left handed, what they had for their dinner the night before and whether or not they had a crap before going to work.
It is not that impossible. THAT IS WHY NO ONE HAS EVER BEEN ALLOWED TO EXAMINE THEM!

 

[charliegolf]

Here's a thing. Polling. Of course it can be wildly wrong and pollies have paid the price for relying on it in the past. But wouldn't you expect (in the event of a steal) all the polls pointing toward Trump; then being wildly out due to the Dominion/Smartmatic reprogramming?

In the event, here's what one of the Trump inner circle said...

"And one thing I would just note: The results of the election almost perfectly aligned with our internal polling. So this notion that everyone’s kind of surprised and it turned out so different than we were expecting—I mean, from what I was read into, we always knew Pennsylvania was going to be a huge uphill battle, as was Arizona. North Carolina would be a squeaker. We’d win Florida.

Georgia was the one that we just did not adequately have a read on, on how close that would be. But none of this should have come as a surprise to anyone who was following the data." Alyssa Farah.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/01/07/alyssa-farah-q-and-a-456369

How does the deep state skew 'our internal polling', to make it match what 'they' are going to steal?

 

[denso13]

You seem to believe that the courts' refusal to allow evidence to be presented means that there is no evidence.

All courts? What if I showed you one where affidavits (evidence, you claim) were submitted, considered and rejected? Would you just claim again that all courts are corrupt.

You have still not shown one single piece of evidence. Go on, pick your best one, you've got loads.

 

[denso13]

then being wildly out due to the Dominion/Smartmatic reprogramming?

Another claim which can't be substantiated either. Seemingly Biden's votes in Georgia were boosted over t'internet from Italy but three hand recounts show the machine counts were correct. Funny that.

 

[charliegolf]

Another claim which can't be substantiated either. Seemingly Biden's votes in Georgia were boosted over t'internet from Italy but three hand recounts show the machine counts were correct. Funny that.

For my sanity Denso, can you confirm you knew I wasn't supporting any such nonsense! Ta.

 

[denso13]

Sorry, of course you weren't, and it wasn't a criticism of you. I took a bit of your post to make a point about something else but could have done it better.

 

[charliegolf]

Cheers mate, no criticism received. (I'm a Trumper lol)