Himmy's bitch has spoken again
now that wasn't a response to anything nasty or abusive that anyone has said about bloaty.
It was just a spontaneous nasty, abusive post.
Adding no value.
Himmy's bitch has spoken again
You protesteth far too much dear.Why do you ignore the question? Is it because you can't prove it and your blaming me for threads being locked is guesswork? You joined in with the comments, it could've been you. But you are so certain you're perfect aren't you? Deluded..
No it wasn't. Please go read the post by Noseall I responded to. It wasn't spontaneous, nor was my choice of words. Choice of words was down to having previous run-ins with Noseall.now that wasn't a response to anything nasty or abusive that anyone has said about bloaty.
It was just a spontaneous nasty, abusive post.
Adding no value.
Still no proof I see.You protesteth far too much dear.
Cowering behind a private profile I see.Still no proof I see.
Just search my name if you need to find my previous posts. It's not hard.Cowering behind a private profile I see.
The posts are locked. Read them. You will see for yourself. Now go and have a lie down because I am. Goodnight.Still no proof I see. Just more side-stepping, like normal.
Hey Blighty, you could make this thread three in a row - as in the third to get locked. You seem like an angry gal.
You're the one getting posts locked, dear.
No, there's no proof, that's just your opinion. BIG difference and one you have trouble understanding. My opinion is that it was your fault the thread got locked. Should I state that as a fact like you? Lol.The posts are locked. Read them. You will see for yourself. Now go and have a lie down because I am. Goodnight.
You can lead a whore to culture, but you can't make them think!
er, how does it go -
Oh yes, I remember,
Smile, snap
So, going back a couple of pages, what was wrong with my post that you thought it offended your sensibilities and was worthy of a "Smile, Snap" ?Did you think it was racist, sexist, or whoreticulturist?
Please explain your thinking.
How do you think it compares to you calling others a bitch?
Thinking in the manner of which you think and taking everything literally and quick to judge, do you think your comment about 'whores' is at all distasteful. Where were your principles when you decided to call women whores? And uncultured ones at that. Very nice of you Himmy.So, going back a couple of pages, what was wrong with my post that you thought it offended your sensibilities and was worthy of a "Smile, Snap" ?
mitch also made some spurious comment but was unable to explain himself.
Tranny also thinks that a reference to marbles is somehow racist, or sexist, or derogatory of the disabled.
Isn't it funny how the only posters that you have a disagreement with are the posters that challenge racism!
Where's your principles now?
It's a saying, like pot, kettle, black!Thinking in the manner of which you think and taking everything literally and quick to judge, do you think your comment about 'whores' is at all distasteful.
It applies to males as well as females!Where were your principles when you decided to call women whores?
As bad as accusing others of being a bitch?And uncultured ones at that. Very nice of you Himmy.
Or as bad as calling others knobs?I have disagreements with people who are knobs
Pot, kettle, black!with double standards when they lecture.
I don't think it's a coincidence. Not any more!It just a be a coincidence that you and JohnD are anti-racist.
My comment was about tranny being a racist or a defender of racists