Thank you firstly for all your replies, I scoured the internet until the early hours and this seems to be a regular occurance with certain insurers, and the same names cropping up over and over again, the ones I insured with included, as on here there are mixed views.
RNReindeer, I had read this on the Confused site last night they say...
"...if you cancel with just two months or less left to run, you may be entitled to no refund. In a case such as this, it may not be worth cancelling the policy at all, as doing so will incur a cancellation charge."
They say they are ".. a British price comparison website specialising in insurance and financial services".
So where they say about NOT cancelling, does this mean its ok to do that, I presume they know.
I really don't know what to do here, whether to respond to the letter or just ignore it.
I also read on the internet and in one of the earlier replies that if the buyer does not have insurance (which in this case they definitely do), and they have an accident, this would then be passed to my insurers as the insurance is still running and consequently they will come after me for a hell of lot of money, but the policy says that failure to inform them of any changes will result in the policy being cancelled, which means there is NO insurance held by anyone.
If I send them the insurance certificate, which they want, can they at least check with DVLA to prove exactly the date the bike was sold, as me just saying it probably proves nothing. At least that way I WILL be entitled to a part refund, its in their policy wording, BUT I will also pay the cancellation fee which should make things about even and I probably should owe nothing.
By the way the total for the year was £74 for 12 months insurance and paid in full.
Sorry if all this is a bit long winded but time is starting to run out and I really don't whether to ignore their letter or send them what they need.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE £50, the whole thing is very, very wrong.
RNReindeer, I had read this on the Confused site last night they say...
"...if you cancel with just two months or less left to run, you may be entitled to no refund. In a case such as this, it may not be worth cancelling the policy at all, as doing so will incur a cancellation charge."
They say they are ".. a British price comparison website specialising in insurance and financial services".
So where they say about NOT cancelling, does this mean its ok to do that, I presume they know.
I really don't know what to do here, whether to respond to the letter or just ignore it.
I also read on the internet and in one of the earlier replies that if the buyer does not have insurance (which in this case they definitely do), and they have an accident, this would then be passed to my insurers as the insurance is still running and consequently they will come after me for a hell of lot of money, but the policy says that failure to inform them of any changes will result in the policy being cancelled, which means there is NO insurance held by anyone.
If I send them the insurance certificate, which they want, can they at least check with DVLA to prove exactly the date the bike was sold, as me just saying it probably proves nothing. At least that way I WILL be entitled to a part refund, its in their policy wording, BUT I will also pay the cancellation fee which should make things about even and I probably should owe nothing.
By the way the total for the year was £74 for 12 months insurance and paid in full.
Sorry if all this is a bit long winded but time is starting to run out and I really don't whether to ignore their letter or send them what they need.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE £50, the whole thing is very, very wrong.