So therefore the blockade IS illegal...Gaza is not recognised by Israel as a state, or part of a state (oh the irony..)..
I'm sure you know why?
So therefore the blockade IS illegal...Gaza is not recognised by Israel as a state, or part of a state (oh the irony..)..
I'm sure you know why?
Absolutely Right!Folk here seem to be saying it's OK for Israeli troops to open fire because they were attacked.
Seems pretty clearcut to me. A boat sailing in international water is suddenly boarded by armed troops. Of course you will defend yourself.
If the Israeli troops had not boarded, there would have been no need for defence.
Folk here seem to be saying it's OK for Israeli troops to open fire because they were attacked.
Seems pretty clearcut to me. A boat sailing in international water is suddenly boarded by armed troops. Of course you will defend yourself.
If the Israeli troops had not boarded, there would have been no need for defence.
I've answered your original question your new point should be in a new thread(see you there).No I'm not...you questioned the illegality, and I'm answering you.Now you're moving to a different argument
I note you havn't answered the actual point, but then neither does Israel...
can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?Israel are not the aggressors.
So therefore the blockade IS illegal...Gaza is not recognised by Israel as a state, or part of a state (oh the irony..)..
I'm sure you know why?
I've answered your original question your new point should be in a new thread(see you there).No I'm not...you questioned the illegality, and I'm answering you.Now you're moving to a different argument
I note you havn't answered the actual point, but then neither does Israel...
Hamas?can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?Israel are not the aggressors.
Folk here seem to be saying it's OK for Israeli troops to open fire because they were attacked.
Seems pretty clearcut to me. A boat sailing in international water is suddenly boarded by armed troops. Of course you will defend yourself.
If the Israeli troops had not boarded, there would have been no need for defence.
can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?Israel are not the aggressors.
trouble is, I've condemned BOTH sides...or havn't you read the whole thread?can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?Israel are not the aggressors.
or ellal's?
I've answered your original question your new point should be in a new thread(see you there).No I'm not...you questioned the illegality, and I'm answering you.Now you're moving to a different argument
I note you havn't answered the actual point, but then neither does Israel...
lol...
when challenged, you (like all those who spout certain animal droppings) try to divert things - won't work, as you've been caught out...
trouble is, I've condemned BOTH sides...or havn't you read the whole thread?can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?Israel are not the aggressors.
or ellal's?
you're still spouting animal droppings...
trouble is, I've condemned BOTH sides...or havn't you read the whole thread?can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?Israel are not the aggressors.
or ellal's?
you're still spouting animal droppings...