Israel..wouldn't we do the same?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Folk here seem to be saying it's OK for Israeli troops to open fire because they were attacked.

Seems pretty clearcut to me. A boat sailing in international water is suddenly boarded by armed troops. Of course you will defend yourself.

If the Israeli troops had not boarded, there would have been no need for defence.
Absolutely Right!
 
Folk here seem to be saying it's OK for Israeli troops to open fire because they were attacked.

Seems pretty clearcut to me. A boat sailing in international water is suddenly boarded by armed troops. Of course you will defend yourself.

If the Israeli troops had not boarded, there would have been no need for defence.

MEMO TO SELF...READ THE WHOLE THREAD :oops: MEMO TO SELF...READ THE WHOLE THREAD :oops: MEMO TO SELF...READ THE WHOLE THREAD :oops: MEMO TO SELF...READ THE WHOLE THREAD :oops: MEMO TO SELF...READ THE WHOLE THREAD :oops: MEMO TO SELF...READ THE WHOLE THREAD :oops:

I stand fully by what I have written. As usualy, I have failed to read every post and of course some posters got there before me.

I'm late for parties, too... :oops:
 
Sponsored Links
Now you're moving to a different argument ;)
No I'm not...you questioned the illegality, and I'm answering you.

I note you havn't answered the actual point, but then neither does Israel... ;)
I've answered your original question ;) your new point should be in a new thread(see you there).

lol...

when challenged, you (like all those who spout certain animal droppings) try to divert things - won't work, as you've been caught out... :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Folk here seem to be saying it's OK for Israeli troops to open fire because they were attacked.

Seems pretty clearcut to me. A boat sailing in international water is suddenly boarded by armed troops. Of course you will defend yourself.

If the Israeli troops had not boarded, there would have been no need for defence.

Weak argument that.

Ships are boarded at sea frequently, the crew and passengers seldom resist.
The Israelis did not board with the intention of killing people did they?.
It is clear that on only one of the vessels was there any resistance. Did they open fire at the outset? or did they open fire once it became clear they were likely to be killed.

Again, if the blockade is legal the crew and passengers were legally obliged to comply with orders given them by Israel. At some point in the future the legalities of what went on will be tested.
 
[quote="ajstoneservices";p="1632507"

or ellal's?[/quote]

:D :D :D :D :D
Strange how muslims never see themselves as the aggressors isn't it?
 
Now you're moving to a different argument ;)
No I'm not...you questioned the illegality, and I'm answering you.

I note you havn't answered the actual point, but then neither does Israel... ;)
I've answered your original question ;) your new point should be in a new thread(see you there).

lol...

when challenged, you (like all those who spout certain animal droppings) try to divert things - won't work, as you've been caught out... :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:

Beg your pardon! your question was answered. Because you refuse to accept it won't change anything will it.
 
Israel are not the aggressors.
can anyone guess where skitzee's sympathies lie?

or ellal's?
trouble is, I've condemned BOTH sides...or havn't you read the whole thread?

you're still spouting animal droppings... ;)

I have also said that neither of them smell of roses, but I have made it very clear where my sympathies lie....and it isn't with the state that voted in a known terrorist organisation that glorifies in the death of children who committed the little known crime of getting on a bus.

Let's be clear, when we hear of people killed in actions like this, we sympathise, when the towers went down, they were cheering in the street.
Where do YOUR sympathies lie? With hamas?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top