It’s all your fault if you are a man

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

Try to remember that tranny is a troll, and that what he writes is intended to cause offence.

There is no reason to suppose that anything he writes is true.

Then perhaps he'll have the decency to admit that he was lying?
I have asked him if he was, and he has declined to answer.
If he is to be allowed to continue trolling, then he must expect to be trolled in return.

 

[JohnD]

You are making a mistake if you expect a lying troll to tell the truth.

 

[Scarlet Pimpernel]

You are making a mistake if you expect a lying troll to tell the truth.

Then they must expect to be trolled in return.
The mods can influence the culture of the forum, if they so wish.
Allow the trolls to continue, and they can be trolled in return. Or stop the trolls in their tracks.
It would appear they have made their decision.
How long have the trolls been posting?
And the trolling continues.

 

[noseall]

I. Let the women stay in, not curtail the freedoms of men.

I had no idea you were Muslim.

 

[SirGalahad]

The hypocrisy.

When a group gets targeted and blamed for the actions of a few it's fair game but not when "Men" become the targteed group. It's wrong that the actions of a few get to be blamed on the collective but then that would requre a full rethink and acceptance of the hypocrisy so might as well continue with the cognitive dissonance.

 

[jeds]

Then they must expect to be trolled in return.
The mods can influence the culture of the forum, if they so wish.
Allow the trolls to continue, and they can be trolled in return. Or stop the trolls in their tracks.
It would appear they have made their decision.
How long have the trolls been posting?
And the trolling continues.

Trolls usually change their names often - probably due to being banned. How many times have you changed your name - or been banned?

 

[just pumps]

Trolls usually change their names often - probably due to being banned. How many times have you changed your name - or been banned?

Don`t expect an honest, straight answer to that, instead expect anger and deflection.

 

[Lower]

The hypocrisy.

When a group gets targeted and blamed for the actions of a few it's fair game but not when "Men" become the targteed group. It's wrong that the actions of a few get to be blamed on the collective but then that would requre a full rethink and acceptance of the hypocrisy so might as well continue with the cognitive dissonance.

So do you agree with the actions of the few being applied to the collective?

 

[SirGalahad]

So do you agree with the actions of the few being applied to the collective?

Perhaps if you read what I wrote you will find the response. The hypocrisy overload on here.

 

[Lower]

You quoted my post, but failed entirely to address the comment.

It's OK to have different opinions, and no-one would deny anyone that right.
Bit when some resort to xenophobic, islamophobic, racist comments in their arguments, they should be confronted. That is all that I do. That is the behaviour that I am vilified by many for, including yourself.
They usually, as you have just implied, resort to baseless allegations such as, "calling everyone racist", etc.
That is a baseless and false allegation. I call out racism, xenophobia, islamophobia and other prejudices when I encounter them.
There are a few posters on this forum who are invariably racist, xenophobic, islamophobic, etc in their comments.
There are a few that skirt the periphery of justifying, defending and excusing those prejudices.

My perception is that it is you that keeps applying these labels, and it is you that 'calls out' what you perceive to be these traits.

Others do it too, but not as frequently, quickly or tenuously.

 

[SirGalahad]

Don`t expect an honest, straight answer to that, instead expect anger and deflection.

Bojo does that in every PMQs... Holding a forumite to a higher standard than the PM.

 

[Lower]

Perhaps if you read what I wrote you will find the response. The hypocrisy overload on here.

I did, and i noted your comments about hypocrisy. But i wasn't clear whether you thought it was acceptable to blame the collective for the actions of a few or whether you were arguing the opposite.

 

[SirGalahad]

I did, and i noted your comments about hypocrisy. But i wasn't clear whether you thought it was acceptable to blame the collective for the actions of a few or whether you were arguing the opposite.

It's hypocritical saying as men we are being targeted collectively but yet when some other group is similarly targeted collectively they either participate or justify it.

 

[motorbiking]

The hypocrisy.

When a group gets targeted and blamed for the actions of a few it's fair game but not when "Men" become the targteed group. It's wrong that the actions of a few get to be blamed on the collective but then that would requre a full rethink and acceptance of the hypocrisy so might as well continue with the cognitive dissonance.

I can't imagine a scenario where someone who claimed to be politically moderate could openly campaign for a 6PM curfew of black, muslim, jews etc.. because a person in that group committed a heinous crime. Can you?

 

[just pumps]

Bojo does that in every PMQs... Holding a forumite to a higher standard than the PM.

Every politican from all parties does the same so go play your anti Bojo card elsewhere.