ITVx Issues

[Mottie]

ReganandCarter published someone's address.

When?

Now motorbiking has published someone's first name.
I'd say that's an illegal disclosure of personal data of the highest magnitude.

You soppy tart.

If the story is false, and the data released is not accurate, it makes the member that disclosed the data, a liar.

So was the data false when someone said you name was Jim?

But at the moment they appear to be content to allow it to continue.

Or maybe they just think that disclosing a first name is so petty as to be insignificant.

 

[gant]

What a short memory you have Jim when you accused me of being a pedophile you big tart.
Think you have ideas above your station, your a nomark on diynot that spouts crap nothing more nothing less.

 

[Roy Bloom]

When?

Some time ago, and just recently when he wanted to visit someone.

You soppy tart.

The Data Protection Act:

Unlawful obtaining etc of personal data​

(1)It is an offence for a person knowingly or recklessly—

(a)to obtain or disclose personal data without the consent of the controller,

(b)to procure the disclosure of personal data to another person without the consent of the controller, or

(c)after obtaining personal data, to retain it without the consent of the person who was the controller in relation to the personal data when it was obtained.

Data Protection Act 2018

www.legislation.gov.uk

I assume motorbiking is familair with it.

So was the data false when someone said you name was Jim?

Still stalking, snoopy?
Tryinig to illicit any minute personal data to weaponise.
I suggest you re-read the above.

Or maybe they just think that disclosing a first name is so petty as to be insignificant.

They attempted to convince the forum readers that the address and the name was genuine.
That is clearly illegal.
It doesn't matter if the data was correct or not, they acted knowingly and wantonly to try to cause harm and distress.

 

[Roy Bloom]

What a short memory you have Jim when you accused me of being a pedophile you big tart.
Think you have ideas above your station, your a nomark on diynot that spouts crap nothing more nothing less.

Supporting evidence?
Or yet another unsupported, untrue, pernicious accusation?
I know the answer to my question.
It needs you to prove me wrong by presenting the evidence.

 

[gant]

Suffering from amnesia now, how convenient charlatan.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Suffering from amnesia now, how convenient charlatan.

Evidence?
Do I need to post in large format for you to read it?

 

[gant]

The readers of the forum will recall when you accused me of playing with little boys given your amnesia is giving you trouble remembering.
Storm in a teacup to me but a reminder to you that people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones if they've no big boy pants they can wear

 

[Roy Bloom]

The readers of the forum will recall when you accused me of playing with little boys given your amnesia is giving you trouble remembering.
Storm in a teacup to me but a reminder to you that people in glasshouses shouldn't throw stones if they've no big boy pants they can wear

So present the evidence?
If it exists.
If you can't you're making unsupported, unprovable accusations.
That's silly, childish, spiteful and vexatious lies.

 

[gant]

So your saying I'm a liar and would make something like that up.
Given your posting history I don't think there's anymore be said.

 

[Roy Bloom]

So your saying I'm a liar and would make something like that up.
Given your posting history I don't think there's anymore be said.

I fully agree. If you make such unpleasant accusations, and you're not prepared to present the evidence, you might as well go whistle in the wind for all the good you're doing.
Except you're doing yourself more damage than anyone else.

 

[gant]

Your so obvious.

 

[Roy Bloom]

Your so obvious.

No, not mine.

 

[Diver Fred]

>>Snip<<
However, if the PO were responsible for providing a resilient network it's not the fault of Fujitsu if they were unaware of the potential problems.
Except of course, they should have designed a system that could cope with network outages.
>>Snip<<

I'd say the PO were responsible for providing a poorly designed specification. From what I've seen it was a 'dispersed' processing system.

I've worked on - worked in the Test Environment for 3 major computer based systems; 2 of which had/have major implications for the service providers and their customers if poorly spec'd and implemented. In all cases we did enormous amounts of testing on the test environment from a very simple system to the full size system.

As with so many dispersed computer systems especially where there is 'remote' means of input the 'Master' system should always be known in case of communications failure. In the case of the 'Horizon' system that ought to have been the unit at the individual PO's. That issue was not helped with the ability of Fujitsu being able to do updates to the live system in real time. From watching the programs I gained the impression it was as if the PO people had no idea that Fujitsu had machine code or program level access to the live network at all times - something which should never been allowed.

 

[motorbiking]

The Data Protection Act:

Data Protection Act 2018

www.legislation.gov.uk

I assume motorbiking is familiar with it.

Extremely, which is why I am finding this hilarious. Perhaps you'd like to try a private prosecution? Would you like help drafting the NPO that you'll need to serve?

 

[Roy Bloom]

Perhaps you'd like to try a private prosecution? Would you like help drafting the NPO that you'll need to serve?

No thanks. You've demonstrated that you're not just careless with personal data, you vexatiously, intentionally, recklessly and knowingly disclose it as a form of abuse and an attempt to discredit, despite being fully aware of the illegality of your actions.

You've become notorious, with fake news reports, fake claims of air support, fake allegations of all sorts, not to mention toy-throwing tantrums.
I wouldn't trust you with a paper round, let alone persoanl data.