N
Same as saying "Cant understand why people are still having RECREATIONAL sex when blow up dolls are readily available"Can't understand why peeps still smoke tobacco when vapes are readily available
Eh? What a strange comparison. Are you saying having sex with someone you know irl can and probably will give you lung cancer?Same as saying "Cant understand why people are still having sex when blow up dolls are readily available"Can't understand why peeps still smoke tobacco when vapes are readily available
Well forgetting long term smoking can and often does give you copd, heart disease, strokes, cataracts and blindness, diabetes and countless other illnesses. Yes I get your point.Sex can give you all sorts, smoking may not give you lung cancer.
May I suggest you wear a facemask in the company of vapors if it worries you so?As an ex smoker I still love the smell of tobacco smoke & it doesn't bother me at all . Vaping on the other hand worries me more as the vapour droplets people breathe in passively have been in people's respiratory system & may be passing on God knows what.
'May' being the operative word. Prove it or gtfo whilst were at it shall we ban diesel engines, alcohol, sex and bacon etc etc?Just glad that I'm not a smoker (apart from an experimental coupla months as a kid.........)
I fear that vaping will become a serious public health concern in years to come, as time is given chance to show its effects.
The vapour is created by very high temperatures within the device itself, leading to all sorts of carcinogenic checmicals being produced. Stuff which the "vaper" inhales deep into their lungs (very suitable place, and in a very suitable form, to allow the nasties to pass into the bloodstream).
It is as good as certain that smoking significantly increases the chances of a terrible disease / condition, so vaping in itself may be the lesser of two evils. But I would guess that it should be used as a transient measure to wean the smoker off smoking AND vaping, not as a long-term / permanent substitute for the fags. Otherwise, we may live to see it as being as bad as (or even worse than) the smoking it was intended to rid people of.
Difference being diesel, booze, shagging, and bacon, have been around for ages, and are necessities! Governments are unlikely to ban popular commodities or pastimes, without better alternatives being in place, for obvious reasons.'May' being the operative word. Prove it or gtfo whilst were at it shall we ban diesel engines, alcohol, sex and bacon etc etc?Just glad that I'm not a smoker (apart from an experimental coupla months as a kid.........)
I fear that vaping will become a serious public health concern in years to come, as time is given chance to show its effects.
The vapour is created by very high temperatures within the device itself, leading to all sorts of carcinogenic checmicals being produced. Stuff which the "vaper" inhales deep into their lungs (very suitable place, and in a very suitable form, to allow the nasties to pass into the bloodstream).
It is as good as certain that smoking significantly increases the chances of a terrible disease / condition, so vaping in itself may be the lesser of two evils. But I would guess that it should be used as a transient measure to wean the smoker off smoking AND vaping, not as a long-term / permanent substitute for the fags. Otherwise, we may live to see it as being as bad as (or even worse than) the smoking it was intended to rid people of.