A Landlord has disconnected a tenants gas supply to one of its properties with the agreement of their tenant who continually complained of suffering from carbon monoxide poisoning and on two occasions called an ambulance.
On the last occasion the tenant was found to be heating his property using his gas cooker. In fact the tenant has had 23 separate visits (over 6 months) in relation to imagined problems with his and his neighbours 'noisy' boiler.
The tenant has mental health issues BUT the landlord has no proof of this. The tenant now wants his gas supply back on but the landlord feels its safer for him and his neighbours not to re-instate his supply based on their own risk assessment of the situation.
The tenant has been offered an alternative source of heating but has refused this.
Would anyone care to comment on the landlords legal position?
On the last occasion the tenant was found to be heating his property using his gas cooker. In fact the tenant has had 23 separate visits (over 6 months) in relation to imagined problems with his and his neighbours 'noisy' boiler.
The tenant has mental health issues BUT the landlord has no proof of this. The tenant now wants his gas supply back on but the landlord feels its safer for him and his neighbours not to re-instate his supply based on their own risk assessment of the situation.
The tenant has been offered an alternative source of heating but has refused this.
Would anyone care to comment on the landlords legal position?