Lead Joint

[Sylvan Tieger]

he may have paid attention BUT being unarmed he would not have listened

It would be nice to think that this makes sense to someone.

your the one who started on guns why not pick something else to ban like free speech or cutting down trees

 

[Softus]

he may have paid attention BUT being unarmed he would not have listened

It would be nice to think that this makes sense to someone.

your the one who started on guns

Clearly I wasn't:

PS Do you use .45 Colt and roll your own if you know what I mean, and if so have you tried the lead heads with what I would call a criss cross on the parelel bit.

I tried to import some but could not get any one to handle them.

Which was followed by your impression of a crazed Terminator.

 

[wiggikins]

he may have paid attention BUT being unarmed he would not have listened

It would be nice to think that this makes sense to someone.

What its saying is if she had shot the driver he would have slowed down, Probably.

Thank you Do it all for translating American to English I thought there was a language problem..

THERE IS NO SUCH LANGUAGE AS AMERICAN, IT'S ENGLISH , GET USED TO IT!! And BTW try a Ruger super K44 Blackhawk for a decent handgun! The recoil will make your eyes water!

 

[Sylvan Tieger]

And BTW try a Ruger super K44 Blackhawk for a decent handgun! The recoil will make your eyes water!
__________________

50 CAL AE Desert Eagle

Thompson/Center Encore available with

22-250 204 Ruger 6.8 Rem 260 Rem 7 mm-08, 243, 308, 270, 30-06, 375 JDJ, 204 Ruger, 44 Mag, 454 Casull, Ruger 444, 480 Ruger, 450 Marlin

Forget recoil, the BOOM alone will give your target a heart attack, JUST pointing this firearm will have an entire army drop to their knees and surrender

 

[Softus]

Guns.

Killing.

Guns and killing.

Guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns guns, and killing.

 

[Sylvan Tieger]

On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States handed
down a landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller. This
case represents the first time the Court has considered in detail
the nature and scope of the Second Amendment.

At issue were the District of Columbia's laws which largely ban all
handgun possession within the city and which require all long arms
to be unloaded and either disassembled or fitted with a trigger
lock, rendering them essentially unavailable for self defense as
"functional firearms."

The Court, in a 5-4 decision which struck down both the outright
handgun ban and the "functional firearms" ban, held that the Second
Amendment guarantees a strong individual right to keep and bear
arms, which includes the right to have arms for self defense in the
home.

( A mans HOME is not his Castle in DICTORSHIP Countries ..As Soft in the head blokes have more compassion for the criminals then the victims)

There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that this is an excellent
result which gun owners should be very pleased with. The decision
clearly and unambiguously establishes the strong and fundamental
nature of the individual right to keep and bear arms.

Significantly, however, the Court noted that the right to keep and
bear arms is not without limitations, just as the right to free
speech is not unlimited. The Court stated that its decision should
not be read to cast doubt on such laws as long standing
prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the
mentally ill, or in such sensitive places as schools or government
buildings and the like. Thus, the Court clearly signaled that
there are a variety of gun laws which are permissible under the
Second Amendment.


(Mentally ill lets out BLOKES from England I GUESS)

This has two significant implications for the future. First, it
will take many future lawsuits to establish precisely what sort of
laws are and are not permissible under the Second Amendment. Both
sides will likely find themselves fighting that battle vigorously.

Second, those laws that are, in fact, permitted under the Second
Amendment will form the fertile ground upon which future political
activity will rest. It will remain the province of law abiding gun
owners to oppose, politically, gun laws which, though
constitutional, are nevertheless unwise and harmful to liberty and
safety.

GOD BLESS ALL FREEDOM LOVING COUNTRIES Fox hunt any one ?? OOPS no guns EH mate?

See Soft in the head blokes who think GUNS take on a life of their own and kill make it bad for their countrymen who are not "mentally unstable"

NUT cases, NUTS CASES,NUTS cases = LOSS OF FREEDOMS

 

[Softus]

The Court, in a 5-4 decision which struck down both the outright handgun ban and the "functional firearms" ban, held that the Second Amendment guarantees a strong individual right to keep and bear arms, which includes the right to have arms for self defense in the home.

D.C. Mayor Adrian Fenty responded with a plan to require residents to register their handguns. "More handguns in the District of Columbia will only lead to more handgun violence," Fenty said.

In a dissent he summarized from the bench, Justice John Paul Stevens wrote that the majority "would have us believe that over 200 years ago, the Framers made a choice to limit the tools available to elected officials wishing to regulate civilian uses of weapons."

He said such evidence "is nowhere to be found."

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a separate dissent in which he said, "In my view, there simply is no untouchable constitutional right guaranteed by the Second Amendment to keep loaded handguns in the house in crime-ridden urban areas."

Joining Scalia were Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Samuel Alito, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas. The other dissenters were Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter.

 

[wiggikins]

On June 26, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States handed
down a landmark decision in District of Columbia v. Heller. This
case represents the first time the Court has considered in detail
the nature and scope of the Second Amendment.

At issue were the District of Columbia's laws which largely ban all
handgun possession within the city and which require all long arms
to be unloaded and either disassembled or fitted with a trigger
lock, rendering them essentially unavailable for self defense as
"functional firearms."

The Court, in a 5-4 decision which struck down both the outright
handgun ban and the "functional firearms" ban, held that the Second
Amendment guarantees a strong individual right to keep and bear
arms, which includes the right to have arms for self defense in the
home.

( A mans HOME is not his Castle in DICTORSHIP Countries ..As Soft in the head blokes have more compassion for the criminals then the victims)

There should be no doubt in anyone's mind that this is an excellent
result which gun owners should be very pleased with. The decision
clearly and unambiguously establishes the strong and fundamental
nature of the individual right to keep and bear arms.

Significantly, however, the Court noted that the right to keep and
bear arms is not without limitations, just as the right to free
speech is not unlimited. The Court stated that its decision should
not be read to cast doubt on such laws as long standing
prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons or the
mentally ill, or in such sensitive places as schools or government
buildings and the like. Thus, the Court clearly signaled that
there are a variety of gun laws which are permissible under the
Second Amendment.


(Mentally ill lets out BLOKES from England I GUESS)

This has two significant implications for the future. First, it
will take many future lawsuits to establish precisely what sort of
laws are and are not permissible under the Second Amendment. Both
sides will likely find themselves fighting that battle vigorously.

Second, those laws that are, in fact, permitted under the Second
Amendment will form the fertile ground upon which future political
activity will rest. It will remain the province of law abiding gun
owners to oppose, politically, gun laws which, though
constitutional, are nevertheless unwise and harmful to liberty and
safety.

GOD BLESS ALL FREEDOM LOVING COUNTRIES Fox hunt any one ?? OOPS no guns EH mate?

See Soft in the head blokes who think GUNS take on a life of their own and kill make it bad for their countrymen who are not "mentally unstable"

NUT cases, NUTS CASES,NUTS cases = LOSS OF FREEDOMS

And i thought all Yanks are NUTS!

 

[sooey]

And i thought all Yanks are NUTS!

The current president being a typical example.

 

[Sylvan Tieger]

And i thought all Yanks are NUTS!

The current president being a typical example.

At least our presidents children do not wear NAZI uniforms to a party.

You think Bush is bad WAIT and see what is instoore for the world LONG live Tony Blair a fine citizen who knows one cannot give in to terrorists demands

By the way soft in the head did not look at the shootings in Washington DC GANG related where they were guns not government licensed.

FYI there were more knife killling then fire arms

 

[sooey]

Since it was your president who declared a war on terror, which seems to be directed against muslims. How about telling us how you can win, without killing every single muslim on Earth.

 

[Norcon]

Don't rise to the bait Sylvan.

Enjoyed that video on Tom Knapp. Fine piece of shooting.
Have a Mossberg pump action and an O/U.
I usually go out and shame myself on a clay pigeon line.

 

[sooey]

He seems to have fecked orff, that last question was a bit of a stumper though.

 

[wiggikins]

And i thought all Yanks are NUTS!

The current president being a typical example.

At least our presidents children do not wear NAZI uniforms to a party.

You think Bush is bad WAIT and see what is instoore for the world LONG live Tony Blair a fine citizen who knows one cannot give in to terrorists demands

By the way soft in the head did not look at the shootings in Washington DC GANG related where they were guns not government licensed.

FYI there were more knife killling then fire arms

CRANK!

 

[sooey]

CRANK!

No, YANK