Imagine you had a daughter, and your little girl had been blown to pieces on a bus, and you're sorting through the carnage trying to find the bits of her body so you can bury her - are you really going to feel less anger and grief if the bomb had been dropped from a plane flown by a man in uniform rather than carried on by a man in jeans and t-shirt?If you guys really don't understand the fundamental differences between terrorism and warfare I'm not about to waste my time on you.
Are you really going to feel less anger and grief if the person who blew the bus up did it because he was paid to rather than because he believed it would further his cause?
What's the difference from the perspective of the victims?
And to the children who will have to grow up without a Daddy, what difference will they think exists between a planned terror attack and a campaign of warfare?
What's the difference from the perspective of the victims?
Or with the children who grow up with hands or feet missing because they played with an unexploded cluster bomblet - will they be less disabled, or find it easier to get by than if they'd lost the same part to a terrorist booby trap?
What's the difference from the perspective of the victims?
Or with farmers etc who can no longer safely work their land because of all the mines left behind by people engaged in warfare - will their hardships or risks be any less because the mines were laid by men in uniform?
What's the difference from the perspective of the victims?