LIB DEMS ANNIHILATED

tbh i did not vote lib dem but i trust them more than i trust traitors like labour
promsised vote on eu contsituion never got one
gave us communist levels of public sector which is unaffordable
took us into an illegal war
sold off all our gold reserves at prices lower than cash my gold
said education education then brought in tution fees in the first place

true test for the libs is in 4 year time and see if they stayed the course
and country fiances are better for it
if so labour may find them selfs third biggest party as without scotland they are in deep trouble as they never had a majority with out them
 
Sponsored Links
I see Ed Milibland, is now pleading with disgruntled Lib Dem MP's to jump into political bed with Labour. WTF can he offer them? Nowt ;) ;)
 
pred said:
he hasn't back tracked on his policies because he's not the PM, D.C. is the PM, if clegg had got in with a majority and then put up school fees that would have been back tracking, he's trying to achieve as much as posible with the limited power he has

Well done that man; I was wondering who would spot that first! :) :) :) The Libdems didn't win the election; they came third. Nick Clegg is in no position to dictate policy. The best he can do is limit the damage that a majority Conservative government might have brought about. :eek: :eek: :eek: He was on the Andrew Marr show yesterday telling us that, in future, he would have to be a lot more vociferous on this score. Sorry Nick but you should have thought of that a bit earlier. :( :( :(

But his biggest mistake was going into coalition in the first place. There are a lot of fickle voters out there. The number who ditched their local councillors for the perceived sins of Westminster politicians is proof of that. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: Contrary to popular belief, Libdems are not a half-way house between Labour and Conservative (there are very few Labour-Libdem marginals). They're the other opposition to any Conservative government and that's why Conservatives are dead against any change to the voting system, because their MPs are fighting on two fronts.

Nick should have kept his distance and let DC form a minority government. I've heard the arguments against minority governments - about how they're weak and can't get anything done - but I like the idea of a government that has to tread carefully. Without big majorities, the milk snatcher couldn't have sold us out to the money grubbers and Slimy Tony couldn't have dragged us into an illegal war. :evil: :evil: :evil: If you want a strong government that gets things done, get yourself a dictator!

joinerjohn said:
I happen to think that in parliament, anything which requires a vote from MP's should be a free vote. Get rid of the party whip system. MP's are there to represent their constituents, not party policy. They should be allowed to vote with their conscience, not because DC. NC or EM say what way they should vote.

Redoubled in No Trumps! :D :D :D

I see Ed Milibland, is now pleading with disgruntled Lib Dem MP's to jump into political bed with Labour.

Too late mate. Nick offered Labour a coalition right from day one but was turned down and, if my memory is correct, the stumbling block was Gordon who wouldn't stand down. Nice one Gordon. You failed to call an election when you had the chance then threw away your party's last chance to stay in power. What a plonker! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
 
Nick offered Labour a coalition right from day one but was turned down and, if my memory is correct, the stumbling block was Gordon who wouldn't stand down. Nice one Gordon. You failed to call an election when you had the chance then threw away your party's last chance to stay in power. What a plonker! :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Any such coalition could never have worked. There would have been a public out cry. Its common sense, two losers don't make a winner.

It was time up for Labour; Nick probably went into talks with Labour to get a better deal from conservatives.
 
Sponsored Links
SALL2009 said:
There would have been a public out cry.

There would certainly have been a lot of angry Conservative voters.

"We got the most votes but that lot get to stay in government. It's not fair! :cry: :cry: :cry: "

And therein lies the problem of being Conservative; you have two lots lined up against you - or you did until now. Before the Labour party came to prominence, Liberals were called Whigs and they were the other half of a two-party system. Try to imagine a Lab-Con coalition. :confused: :confused: :confused: That's what the current coalition would have looked like a mere century ago. :eek: :eek: :eek:

It was time up for Labour

True. Even without the bankers' antics, a lot of people clearly thought it was time for a change. Oppositions don't win elections; governments lose them. And yet, despite all the cards being stacked against Gordon, it wasn't a Conservative landslide. There are still enough of us around who remember Thatcher. :evil: :evil: :evil:

Nick probably went into talks with Labour to get a better deal from conservatives.

Are you accusing a Right Honourable Member of Parliament of being devious? :LOL: :LOL: :LOL:
 
Isn't the whole point of proportional representation to make sure all votes count?

Therefore if the lib dems and labour and the SNP and the GREEN formed a coalition it would be fair because more voted for those 3 than the Tories.

Opportunity missed Cleggers now you have made your bed .....have a kip in it!
 
Back
Top