Life for Death by Dangerous Driving?

Luckily for you, some of the most dangerous cars ever made are the American tat you adore. :LOL:

what do you no noseall :ROFLMAO:

what ever you drive is tat :ROFLMAO: and that thing as you call it in your car that has caused you some confusion is a jack :ROFLMAO:

its used to change a wheel ;)

:ROFLMAO:
 
Sponsored Links
You are the classic example of the 'non thinker'.
Your deliberate vagueness and ambiguity are both boring and deliberately evasive. You add nothing to any discussion other than fluff and bulls hit. You are the classic moron with nothing to counter and nothing to add.

Speed kills boyo - like it or lump it.
 
I'm all for it, it's about time people started realising driving is a serious business and requires your full attention and there will be meaningful consequences if you choose to not apply the required standards.

Cyclists should be held accountable just the same as other road users but it will probably never happen
 
speed is always a factor

well ER yes Noseall

obviously a stationary car that is not moving may well not be causing an accident :idea:
 
Sponsored Links
that thing as you call it in your car that has caused you some confusion is a jack :ROFLMAO:

its used to change a wheel ;)

:ROFLMAO:
It's used to lift the vehicle, stupid. 'Tis you that knows jack.

Be careful in that US job. Don't drive above 20 MPH for your own safety. (y)
 
It's used to lift the vehicle, stupid. 'Tis you that knows jack.

Be careful in that US job. Don't drive above 20 MPH for your own safety. (y)


yes its used to change a wheel noseall , read yer manual :ROFLMAO: all will be explained that other thing that caused you confusion is a wheel brace
its to undo the nuts / bolts that hold the wheel on :ROFLMAO:

best you dont drive above 20 mph for every one elses safety :ROFLMAO:
 
Last edited:
I'm all for it, it's about time people started realising driving is a serious business and requires your full attention and there will be meaningful consequences if you choose to not apply the required standards.

Cyclists should be held accountable just the same as other road users but it will probably never happen
Yeah it's a weird one, what with cars becoming ever more like mobile multimedia devices as opposed to vehicles for getting from a to b.
 
There's folk out there who are permanently guilty of DLAT, these are not the folk who this soundbite law is aimed at.

This soundbite law is aimed at furious of Tenbury Wells, outraged of Chipping Norton & fuming of the Cotswolds, the ever dwindling readership of the Daily Fail, the Express, The Sun, The Mirror & dare I venture into the deepest depths of recent history, "The News of the World".

The shills that promote it as a good thing for the rest of us fail to acknowledge that we are not all as incredibly stupid as they think we are.

£100 to the charity of your choice to the first who can translate what DLAT is an acronym for.
 
Someone driving their car fast is probably concentrating more on that driving than someone driving along well within the speed limit.
So motorways (people driving fast) must be the safest places for say cyclists and pedestrians then?
 
germany must have the most accidents

ref speedlimits on the auto bahns ? unless the laws have changed
 
So motorways (people driving fast) must be the safest places for say cyclists and pedestrians then?
Are you terminally stupid?

I mean, does your stupidity have an ultimate end date, like 3mths, 6mths or even a year?

Does being stupid mean you going to die, lying in your stupidity as it graduates from simple stupidity to extreme stupidity?

Are you too stupid to ponder on that one?
 
Mum's in a high rise just beside a busy road. When visiting her, I often stand at the kitchen window and watch the various vehicles go by. The amount of speeding and tailgating witnessed is always on the high side. Comes back to what I said before, how dare anyone drive on or near the speed limit.

As for this theory of it's ok to drive faster if you've accurately judged the road conditions, where do you draw the line with such a theory? Let's say there's a 30 limit stretch of road in a built up area. You enter the area, assess the road and surroundings and determine in your opinion it's safe to drive at 40-45, maybe even 50. After all, you're a competent driver, so what's the issue?

You're driving along then, out of nowhere, a pedestrian runs into the road. Maybe the old cliche of a child going after a football they were safely playing with in their garden.

BANG. You hit them, cause you couldn't stop quickly enough. They're dead. You've killed them.

If that happened to you, I suggest you'd be wishing you'd adhered to the speed limit for that stretch of road, or at least stayed within 5mph of it.
 
Are you terminally stupid?

I mean, does your stupidity have an ultimate end date, like 3mths, 6mths or even a year?

Does being stupid mean you going to die, lying in your stupidity as it graduates from simple stupidity to extreme stupidity?

Are you too stupid to ponder on that one?
No answer. As per the rest of the thread.

You are a faker and full of shoite. Speed kills and you have no answer to that other than your smug bulls hit evasion. You are also poorly educated.
 
Are you terminally stupid?

I mean, does your stupidity have an ultimate end date, like 3mths, 6mths or even a year?

Does being stupid mean you going to die, lying in your stupidity as it graduates from simple stupidity to extreme stupidity?

Are you too stupid to ponder on that one?

yes Noseall is stupid so you need to make allowances for him ;)

caused by excessive speed whilst sking , at altitude lack of oxygen causing brain fade
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top