Life insurance

Does this mean that if you have two policies, neither will pay out because of the other?

I have never heard of such a clause on a Life Assurance policy.

The trade makes good profits from selling extra policies to people as they get older and richer.

Certainly ask what the terms are for increasing your existing policy, because it might turn out to be better value than taking out a new one.

If you're insuring your life in case you die, don't get diverted into buying an endowment policy or any kind of savings or investment plan, which will cost you more and is unlikely to be the best vehicle on the market.

Term insurance is remarkably good value, because all it does is pay out if you die. If you take out one to pay off your 25-year mortgage, the chances are that it won't pay out because you probably won't die in the next 25 years, you'll probably live into your 80's. If you have a mortgage protection policy, check its terms. One of the reasons they can be very very cheap is that if you die in year 1, it pays out 100% of the amount borrowed. If you die in year 24, it only has to pay out about 5% of the amount borrowed, because, with a repayment mortgage, the balance owing reduces with every payment you make. If you don't die you get nothing. This makes them so cheap that you'd be a fool not to have one.

BTW I am not impressed by critical illness cover. My thinking is that if I'm insured for 50 ailments, I'll probably die of the 51st. Life assurance will pay out whatever I die of. If you have dependents, that's important.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Critical cover policies can have clauses that limit them if you are otherwise insured. However generally you are better off increasing an existing policy as it often scales better.
 
If it’s a fixed term, say to cover you for your mortgage, it’s life insurance. If it’s to pay out on your eventual death, its life assurance. If the OP wants the former, just increase your original insurance (or cancel that and take out a new one elsewhere if it’s a better deal).
 
Insurance or Assurance

I for IF they pay only IF the event happens.

A for Always. they ALWAYS pay after the event or end of term ( but inflation means the value paid out can be a lot less than the value paid in )

The days when life assurance was a good investment are long gone.
 
Sponsored Links
Hello All

I'm thinking of taking out another life insurance policy. Is there anything saying that I can't have 2 or more policy's?

I have cover with my Morgage
You can have as many policies as you like but you can't be paid out out several times by several policies for the same risk, rather the payout's will be pro-rata from each policy
 
You can have as many policies as you like but you can't be paid out out several times by several policies for the same risk, rather the payout's will be pro-rata from each policy
I don't understand that. So one £500k policy is okay but two £250k policies are not? Each of the £250k policies will only pay out £125K?

Edit: Or are you just talking about the mortgage life policy and not a general one?

We had one policy to pay out on the mortgage if either of us died before it was paid and another policy to pay out if I died before I got to 65 years old. We stopped paying the mortgage insurance when we paid the mortgage off 7 years early but still paying the life insurance.
 
Last edited:
Well in my personal circumstances we had a reducing amount to cover the mortgage if one of us snuffed it (started off in 1990 for £50k but paid it off in 2008 so stopped paying it) and a £150k policy if I die before I’m 65 as my wife wouldn't be able to draw her pension for a few years after I’m 65. I’m 62 this year so I’d better watch out!
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
Back
Top