kendor said:
no i was suggesting that the motor is picking up it's neutral return through one of the lamps, we have already proved that the timer doesn't control the circuit as the yellow wire is out therefore the motor wouldn't be necessarily shorted. Remember this is only a guess at the moment and may very well prove to be flawed yet.
Agreed, we don't have the full picture, but as I see it you were suggesting that this 3-core cable was once one end of a simple 2-way circuit which somebody had converted to the timer, right?
My argument is that such a conversion could never have worked properly in the first place, and Steve said that it was working until recently. Maybe he has another switch he doesn't know about yet, but I take that to mean that the timer was running and turning on and off at the correct times.
Yes, the timer could have "borrowed" its neutral via the lamps, because the resistance of the lamp filaments is much lower than that of the timer motor. But once a switch (either the timer one or the "mystery" switch elsewhere) applied power to the lights, the timer would lose its neutral. The only other lines at this end of that 3-core cable would either be at 240V or open-circuit, so the timer would stop.
(There is actually one way it could have worked like that, and that's if this was wired as the infamous "California/Chicago/French 3-way" arrangement. But as I've never seen such a wiring arrangement in a British house, I think it's most unlikely. )
From the evidence presented so far, I go with Damocles' verdict: Either a short in the wiring (red to yellow), or there's a parallel switch somewhere else which has been closed and not yet discovered.