Loft conversion on New Build Bungalow

[tony1851]

Then I have to say why you are wasting your time on a building related forum posting comments on topics you are “not involved with” and probably know nothing about. I have one suggestion to you if you want to comment on a forum pick one that may have some use of your knowledge, if you cannot find one get a life.

My advice to you would be to find a good book on writing plain and intelligible English.

 

[cadtech]

I think I have touched a nerve here. We are starting to get a bit touchy aren’t we?

 

[tony1851]

I think I have touched a nerve here. We are starting to get a bit touchy aren’t we?

Touchy!? Me???

 

[cadtech]

This particular post is beginning a little boring. Having comments from individuals who are only interested in prolonging conversations that have nothing at all to do with construction for obvious reasons they know nothing about the subject in question “construction” javascript:emoticon('')

 

[ban-all-sheds]

The benefit of going down the building notice route is not paying for an architect to draw and submit plans using the services of a cad technician with building savvy is the cheaper option

You don't need an architect to do drawings for a full plans submission. You can use a technician, or a structural engineer, or you can DIY.

 

[ban-all-sheds]

“construction” javascript:emoticon('')

Care to rephrase that?

 

[ban-all-sheds]

I have drawn and submitted plans for noth building and planning purposes

"noth"?

For example a plan submission fee 140£ inspection charge 160£ building notice 375£ this is for a single floor extension not exceeding 10 m2. Loft conversion 160£ plan 240£ insp. Building notice 500£.

I think you'll find that's 10m², not 10m2.

And have you never noticed that we express monetary amounts with a currency sign prefix, not postfix, i.e. £140, £160 etc?

you can contact your lbca and get an individually determined charge but these are generally for large developments.

That was the a new sentence, so it should have been "You", not "you".

And it's "LABC", not "lbca".

The benefit of going down the building notice route is not paying for an architect to draw and submit plans using the services of a cad technician with building savvy is the cheaper option

Without punctuation that's nonsense. Try reading it out loud, as written, i.e. with no pauses whatsoever.

I think the first thing to do is contact your LBCA

LABC.

I understand where you are coming from when yourealiseyou are losing a logical debate based on subject knowledge. Resort to type and start another debate that has nothing at all to do with the original subject you have picked up on my punctuation.

Not just punctuation. Spelling, capitalisation, separation of words (what's "yourealiseyou", for example?). And again, try reading out loud, or asking someone else to read out loud "Resort to type and start another debate that has nothing at all to do with the original subject you have picked up on my punctuation." exactly as written, and see how it sounds.

He's not the plank - you are.

Your job here is to communicate in writing with people, and in that aspect you are careless, lazy and incompetent. Given that you clearly don't give a toss whether you do a good job here, how can you possibly be trusted to do a good job in anything?

 

[cadtech]

To “ban all sheds” you are getting to be a little boring and predictive with your constant posts on corrective grammar. You might need reminding this forum is building related. As much as I enjoy a reasoned debate where something constructive can be achieved that is building related. This one has reached its nadir

 

[tony1851]

As much as I enjoy a reasoned debate where something constructive can be achieved that is building related.

The bad grammar strikes again

 

[cadtech]

Here we go when a discussion reaches its nadir, resort to type and search for anything that diverts the debate from the original topic

 

[tony1851]

nadir

That's a difficult word for your stage; well done!

 

[cadtech]

i thought i would used a word that you would be well acquainted with

 

[ban-all-sheds]

To “ban all sheds” you are getting to be a little boring and predictive with your constant posts on corrective grammar. You might need reminding this forum is building related. As much as I enjoy a reasoned debate where something constructive can be achieved that is building related. This one has reached its nadir

You don't get it, do you.

Through your posts you show that you have no interest in taking care to do a good job. You are slapdash, careless, lazy.

 

[SimonH2]

To “ban all sheds” you are getting to be a little boring and predictive with your constant posts on corrective grammar.

He does seem to particularly enjoy being a pedant, woe betide you if you ever decide to correct a factual error on his part though
But, while his tone was his usual derogatory/deprecating style, he does actually have a point. I don't think anyone (except BAS) expects perfect grammar and spelling from everyone, all the time - but your post was quite hard to read.
If people need to expend a lot of effort to translate your writing into something they can understand, then many won't. Thus the point of making the post (conveying information or opinion) is lost.

 

[cadtech]

So when individuals post on this forum. They all go through the scrutiny of “ban all sheds”
Your description as being a Depreciating derogatory pedant individual in one word sad