Indeed, and it's clearly a policy which is welcomed by customers/users and (as below) may well also e commercially advantageous. However, policies are not necessarily set in stone, and different people have different ideas about them.True, but there's little value in the bases which have nothing but a connector in them. And Aico have said (IIRC) that it's now policy to stick to the one universal base.
Yes, commercially speaking, it's a 'balanced argument', so it comes down to whether the swings or roundabouts win - hence, at least to some extent, a 'commercial gamble' for them.Besides, there's a strong commercial argunent against changing the base ... If the user can just unplug the old alarm and plug in a new one then they are incentivised to stick to the same brand. Once they have the inconvenience and potentially cost (paying someone to do it) of changing the base then they can easily switch brands. So making it easy to stick with your brand makes sense.
We know that consumers are not necessarily rational. Millions of them buy cheaper products despite the fact that reduced reliability and longevity probably mean that they will end up paying more in the long-term.
It's one of the relatively few major brands and they are regarded as very 'reputable', so many people probably buy them, or are advised to use them, purely on that basis - with many people probably not even being aware of the 'base issue'. Furthermore, if one wants to be cynical, some of those "paid to change bases" (or whole alarms) might be tempted to 'recommend' a brand that would increase the amount of future work/money for themselves and their their fellow 'alarm fitters'
However, that's all hypothetical and I certainly agree that the prospect of Aico bases remaining unchanged 'for ever' (at least, definitely for a long time) makes them particularly attractive.
Kind Regards, John