Marcus Rashford

[Mottie]

So 3% fraud. So that means 97% of those that get food vouchers actually do need them.

Maybe 100% of those that are getting food vouchers are the 3% of the total people that commit benefit fraud? Who knows, I don’t. Do you?

 

[Notch7]

Maybe 100% of those that are getting food vouchers are the 3% of the total people that commit benefit fraud? Who knows, I don’t. Do you?

So what are saying is; Mottie, Durham, Benny etc etc have no idea how many of those people getting vouchers are going hungry, you just want to claim they are all just lazy scroungers cos that suits your narrative

Thank you for confirming you lot have no idea, you are all just full of hatred.

 

[ellal]

Quick search....Benefit fraud.2019.£2.6Billion(3%).

Quick search...

"Nearly half a million self-employed workers trousered £1.3bn of taxpayer cash despite suffering NO loss in income during Covid pandemic"
17 per cent applying for the self-employed income support scheme had not had seen their earnings fall.
It would suggest between March and September 435,000 workers received support even though they were not financially worse off."

So given that was for a period of 6 months, roughly the same figure as you allege (pro rata), but a far higher rate (percentage wise) of apparent fraud...

Do you regard that as a 'mere piffle'?

 

[Boogerman]

All kids should receive food.
Fat kids, rich kids, they all should be fed.
We shouldn't just concentrate on poor or hungry kids.

 

[Notch7]

All kids should receive food.
Fat kids, rich kids, they all should be fed.
We shouldn't just concentrate on poor or hungry kids.

Rich kids aren't hungry generally.....they are too far gone on coke.

 

[durhamplumber]

Quick search...

"Nearly half a million self-employed workers trousered £1.3bn of taxpayer cash despite suffering NO loss in income during Covid pandemic"
17 per cent applying for the self-employed income support scheme had not had seen their earnings fall.
It would suggest between March and September 435,000 workers received support even though they were not financially worse off."

So given that was for a period of 6 months, roughly the same figure as you allege (pro rata), but a far higher rate (percentage wise) of apparent fraud...

Do you regard that as a 'mere piffle'?

As usual Lal...you butt in half arßed to someone elses discussion..Gal is a big boy not needing you to defend his honour..(£2b compared to £65 was the debate)

 

[durhamplumber]

Quick search...

"Nearly half a million self-employed workers trousered £1.3bn of taxpayer cash despite suffering NO loss in income during Covid pandemic"
17 per cent applying for the self-employed income support scheme had not had seen their earnings fall.
It would suggest between March and September 435,000 workers received support even though they were not financially worse off."

So given that was for a period of 6 months, roughly the same figure as you allege (pro rata), but a far higher rate (percentage wise) of apparent fraud...

Do you regard that as a 'mere piffle'?

Trying to guess how much a tradesman has lost,Covid related is tricky...Guessing how much a 100% scratter claiming dodgy benefits all his /her life and never working is totally different..You play your cards v close to your chest...You are more than likely a very dodgy character.

 

[JohnD]

Stand clear, everybody.

Dum thinks you need his permission to post on this forum.

someone elses discussion

 

[durhamplumber]

Stand clear, everybody.

Dum thinks you need his permission to post on this forum.

You are more predictable than sunrise Jonny..Butt in by all means but get it right!!!..Are you welded to your armchair?How much exercise have you had this week?

 

[JohnD]

Who gave you permission to post that?

 

[durhamplumber]

Who gave you permission to post that?

Permission granted JB to circuit your chair.Just the once mind.Not strain yourself.

 

[Mottie]

Quick search...

"Nearly half a million self-employed workers trousered £1.3bn of taxpayer cash despite suffering NO loss in income during Covid pandemic"
17 per cent applying for the self-employed income support scheme had not had seen their earnings fall.
It would suggest between March and September 435,000 workers received support even though they were not financially worse off."

So given that was for a period of 6 months, roughly the same figure as you allege (pro rata), but a far higher rate (percentage wise) of apparent fraud...

Do you regard that as a 'mere piffle'?

Bloody self employed. Cant trust 'em, can you Lal? Say, what industry are you in that necessitated you to work through Covid times without a sniff of furlough? Come on, be a big boy and 'fess up, nobody should be ashamed of their occupation.

 

[Boogerman]

Rich kids aren't hungry generally......

I was being facetious, as in BLM - all lives matter - white lives matter, etc.
It's obvious that feeding hungry kids of poor parents will enrich their lives in multiple ways, and society as a whole.
Of course well-fed kids don't need such egalitarian treatment, they're already receiving it.

 

[ellal]

Bloody self employed. Cant trust 'em, can you Lal? Say, what industry are you in that necessitated you to work through Covid times without a sniff of furlough? Come on, be a big boy and 'fess up, nobody should be ashamed of their occupation.

Why the interest?

Oh that's right you're the one milking the system and I'm the one still earning far more than you...

Tiny mind, tiny garden, and a tiny **** it appears you have old man...