Matt Hancock Apologises.

  • Thread starter Deleted member 18243
  • Start date
D

Deleted member 18243

Apologises for breaking covid rules BUT doesn't explain (yet) how he and Gina Codswallop didn't catch the deadly disease after breaking the rules, and why, after not catching the deadly disease he carried on telling the rest of us to follow the rules or else we will catch the deadly disease.


The dominoes are falling.
 
Sponsored Links
My mum told me not to smoke because I could get lung cancer but her and my dad have smoked for over 70 years and they still haven’t got it.……
 
Apologises for breaking covid rules BUT doesn't explain (yet) how he and Gina Codswallop didn't catch the deadly disease after breaking the rules
Andy why don’t you have a think about it yourself, you can work out the circumstances where one person doesn’t infect another, you don’t need us to tell you.
 
He seems like a man who's realised his political career is over and now he's on the outside feels free to pi$$ over the wall. I'm certain his opinion would otherwise have a different tone.
On Newswatch last night, points were raised about the number of stories regarding him coming third in the final of Jungle Celebrity but less attention paid to the winner, Jill ex-footbaaller...(they were on about the difference between men's/women's game and how to call them; i earned a withering look by suggesting 'Fannyball' :giggle: )
 
Sponsored Links
I've never understood why anti-vaxers are so obsessed with people choosing to have vaccinations. It doesn't have any effect on them - in fact, if there is any detrimental effect, it's the other way around. Hundreds of ant-vax demos, banner waving, conspiracy websites, nutcases devoting their lives to it, baricading and raiding vaccination centres, on and on and on. I've never seen anything the other way around. I've asked it many times, nobody is able to give a rational explanation.
 
I've never understood why anti-vaxxers are so obsessed with people choosing to have vaccinations. It doesn't have any effect on them - in fact, if there is any detrimental effect, it's the other way around. Hundreds of ant-vax demos, banner waving, conspiracy websites, nutcases devoting their lives to it, barricading and raiding vaccination centres, on and on and on. I've never seen anything the other way around. I've asked it many times, nobody is able to give a rational explanation.

Because vaccine choosers are rational. and don't need to spout nonsense in support of what they do.
 
I've never understood why anti-vaxers are so obsessed with people choosing to have vaccinations.

Your word "choosing" is pertinent. We are (or should be) a free country and therefore no reasonable person can have any objection to any other individual who chooses to be or not to be vaccinated. The problem is when we are forced to be vaccinated or excluded from essential parts of life because we are not vaccinated; this is what the "antivaxxers" are against.
 
Antivaxxers are like tax avoiders, they say tax should be a choice, but then still want to use public services.
 
Antivaxxers are like tax avoiders, they say tax should be a choice, but then still want to use public services.

What do you think about those people who have bad reactions to the covid vaccines? My own sister-in-law has a heart condition and she says this has worsened since having booster #3. She is refusing to have any more covid boosters now.
 
What do you think about those people who have bad reactions to the covid vaccines?
Bad luck. Very bad luck. Covid vaccines are safer than Calpol.

Same with any medicine, whether that be a life-saving op or any vaccine or drug.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top