S
steviez
Can anyone tell me why you put 25mm tails from meter to CU when most of the time there is only 16mm tails from service head to meter?
If as you say in one of your previous posts you're in college then you should be able to work it out for yourself.
Think about what the purpose of the main fuse/mcb is?
Think about current carrying capacity?
What is the required relationship between the two?
I can't see how that will help to answer the OP's question. Whatever answer he gets to that question will be the same for the cables from cutout to meter as for those from meter to CU.Think about what the purpose of the main fuse/mcb is?
Think about current carrying capacity?
What is the required relationship between the two?
I can't see how that will help to answer the OP's question. Whatever answer he gets to that question will be the same for the cables from cutout to meter as for those from meter to CU.Think about what the purpose of the main fuse/mcb is?
Think about current carrying capacity?
What is the required relationship between the two?
The answer to the OP's actual question (as to why cables are so often of different CSA on the two sides of the meter) is clearly 'bureaucratic' (e.g. differing sets of regs on either side of the meter) and absolutely nothing to do with engineering!
Kind Regards, John.
Quite. If, as is often the case, the 16mm² (or imperial equivalent!) DNOs cables have been there for years (or decades) and have not yet melted, in engineering terms the need for the 'uprating' is clearly very much in question.Most likely it is because an electrician has fitted a new CU and 'uprated' the tails but is not allowed to alter the DNO part of the installation. Whether the uprating is necessary is another matter.
Open you eyes John, look at his previous posts vizI can't see how that will help to answer the OP's question. Whatever answer he gets to that question will be the same for the cables from cutout to meter as for those from meter to CU.Think about what the purpose of the main fuse/mcb is?
Think about current carrying capacity?
What is the required relationship between the two?
The answer to the OP's actual question (as to why cables are so often of different CSA on the two sides of the meter) is clearly 'bureaucratic' (e.g. differing sets of regs on either side of the meter) and absolutely nothing to do with engineering! The laws of physics are clearly not different on the two sides of the meter!
Kind Regards, John.
I already spend far too much time with this forum than I should, and I certainly can't afford myself the luxury of hunting back in history. I take posts at face value, which is what I did here. I'm not saying that you're necessarily wrong in anything you're saying about the OP, merely that I do not do detective work before repsonding to what appear to be straighforward questions (unless the nature of the question causes me concerns).Open you eyes John, look at his previous posts viz ... Do you see a pattern here?
As above, I knew nothing about him being at college, but he was asking a valid question which could not possibly be answered by considering your questions - whatever was the correct 'sizing of the cable relative to the fuse', it would (if same regs/practices applied in both cases) obviously be the same answer on both sides of the meter. If you had said something to intimate that you had 'concerns' about the OP, I would probably have responded differently (if at all) - but, taking the question and your reply at face value, it seemed that you had simply not answered the question (for no apparent reason).If this guy is in college studying to be an electrician ... then considering the questions I posed should help him understand the importance of correctly sizing cables in relation to the the fuse.
As above, all that was in front of my eyes was what appeared to be a valid question and a not-very-helpful response.Or are you so wrapped up in the technicalities of the regulations that you fail to see what is in front of your own eyes.
That is precisely the 'bureaucratic' (different regs) issue to which I was referring. Your regs may 'ascribe' those CCCs, but BS7671 thinks that the CCC of a 16mm² single is only 87A - hence inadequate for a 100A fuse (but OK for an 80A one).Perhaps also the question should be reversed, why is it that when the DNO service is a 2c.0225 PILC (16mm2 equivalent, or an older 16mm2 concentric) why do installers over specify the size of the tails and install 25mm2. Continuous rating of a .0225 is 120A, we ascribe a rating of (if I recall) over 100A to 16mm2.
Thanks. I hope you are recovering rapidly!Somewhere I have an old BICC cable rating book, when I'm back at work (off for a week or so after an operation) I'll have a look.
Yes, I'm sure that's true. I think the interest is probably in how conservative. Empirically, my DNO-side 16mm² cables do not even get notceably warm to the touch at 50A-60A, so they clearly are not going to melt or explode at 100A!There is no doubt in my mind that the BS7671 figures are possibly a bit conservative
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local