Thanks Woody. I didn't reply for a little while as I've been reading up about the matter.
Basically you are correct, the appointed surveyor can now only be unappointed if I kill him
The award drawn up is a legally binding contract, so if I don't bide by it I could be taken to court. However my understanding is that the surveyor cannot do this, only the other owner can do this because my contract is actually with him.
It would only be worth the neighbour doing this if me breaking the terms of the award actually caused them some tangible and calculable loss or inconvenience.
Anyway, I'm hoping it will never get to that sort of situation and shouldn't really on a straightforward job like this.
I've read through the RICS guidelines on the PWA. Basically there are no hard and fast rules about the format the award should take. However it does mention that a method statement will often be provided by the surveyor which will outline how and when the work can take place.
So my surveyor has asked me to provide the method statement instead. I can look at this in one of three ways ie
1) My surveyor is a lazy bugger who wants me to do all the work or
2) Since the surveyor hasn't laid down the rules yet it gives me more flexibility in putting these forward
3) I've agreed to an award that gives the surveyor unlimited power, ie he needs to agree my method statement, what if he doesn't??
Assuming the best of people and not being paranoid leaves me with option 2)
So, I need to put together a method statement and offer it to the surveyor. I'd like to keep it as vague as possible so that it leaves me with maximum wiggle room.
As mentioned, it's a side extension that involves the demolition of my derelict detached garage and will come to within 1m of my neighbour's property.
Could anybody give me any pointers as to how I could format this method statement?
Many thanks