How'd you mean.???
Migration Within EU and its Effect to UK and The Referendum
- Thread starter Himaginn
- Start date
How'd you mean.???
Sponsored Links
Apparently many journalists believe "Pandora's box " to be an increase of the EU budget by 20 billion Euro (paid for by member states) No excuses for not coughing up either as it's the EU. No wonder they want to keep it quiet before the referendum in the UK.
You mean Tara Palmeri believes.....
Interesting it's gone from Tara Palmeri says and now many journalists believe. I do think you're exaggerating again, and again, again.
Nearly as bad as your "someone said"...
She got her information from......A French Official. No names of course. Her informant is so secret we don't know who it is, nor are we ever likely to know.
Perhaps it's that vague Monsieur Rumour.
He sounds French.
B
blightymam
Just a quickie to educate you in the world of journalism and news, journalists do not have to say who the informant is - protection of sources as it's known. A good job too otherwise nobody would speak up.She got her information from......A French Official. No names of course. Her informant is so secret we don't know who it is, nor are we ever likely to know.
Perhaps it's that vague Monsieur Rumour.
Just because there's no names doesn't mean a journalist made it up.
Sponsored Links
I fully accept that blightymam, but it's strange that this journalist has a scoop that no other journalist has heard of, and from an unnamed French official? Pillow talk? She does have a remarkable interest in the affairs of others. And I mean that in the best possible taste. (Kenny Everett)Just a quickie to educate you in the world of journalism and news, journalists do not have to say who the informant is - protection of sources as it's known. A good job too otherwise nobody would speak up.She got her information from......A French Official. No names of course. Her informant is so secret we don't know who it is, nor are we ever likely to know.
Perhaps it's that vague Monsieur Rumour.
Just because there's no names doesn't mean a journalist made it up.
B
blightymam
Oh please, please don't speak about things you don't know! I used to be a snapper for the newspapers and many MANY times a single journo has an excellent and trusted source. Journo's spend a long time building up relationships and most of the time it's on the hush - for obvious reasons when a person may be high up. A high up official is hardly going to have 50 journo friends either are they? Harder to keep quiet when leaking confidential info.I fully accept that blightymam, but it's strange that this journalist has a scoop that no other journalist has heard of, and from an unnamed French official? Pillow talk? She does have a remarkable interest in the affairs of others. And I mean that in the best possible taste. (Kenny Everett)Just a quickie to educate you in the world of journalism and news, journalists do not have to say who the informant is - protection of sources as it's known. A good job too otherwise nobody would speak up.She got her information from......A French Official. No names of course. Her informant is so secret we don't know who it is, nor are we ever likely to know.
Perhaps it's that vague Monsieur Rumour.
Just because there's no names doesn't mean a journalist made it up.
I do not know what you guys are talking about, I only skimmed the last page, but there is every possibility that this source could be reliable. Please don't dismiss it using the fact nobody was named. You clearly do not understand.
But it's equally possible that she did make it up! Or misunderstood what she was actually told.Oh please, please don't speak about things you don't know! I used to be a snapper for the newspapers and many MANY times a single journo has an excellent and trusted source. Journo's spend a long time building up relationships and most of the time it's on the hush - for obvious reasons when a person may be high up. A high up official is hardly going to have 50 journo friends either are they? Harder to keep quiet when leaking confidential info.I fully accept that blightymam, but it's strange that this journalist has a scoop that no other journalist has heard of, and from an unnamed French official? Pillow talk? She does have a remarkable interest in the affairs of others. And I mean that in the best possible taste. (Kenny Everett)Just a quickie to educate you in the world of journalism and news, journalists do not have to say who the informant is - protection of sources as it's known. A good job too otherwise nobody would speak up.She got her information from......A French Official. No names of course. Her informant is so secret we don't know who it is, nor are we ever likely to know.
Perhaps it's that vague Monsieur Rumour.
Just because there's no names doesn't mean a journalist made it up.
I do not know what you guys are talking about, I only skimmed the last page, but there is every possibility that this source could be reliable. Please don't dismiss it using the fact nobody was named. You clearly do not understand.
This story was released two days ago, and since? Not a peep! Not a whisper! Not a shred of substantiation!
It's not difficult to believe, it's impossible to believe that a story like that was only leaked to one obscure reporter. Don't you think.
B
blightymam
Haven't you ever heard the word regarding to stories as "Exclusive"?!
Last edited by a moderator:
My other source Himmy.. http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/647406/EU-burying-power-grab-laws-until-AFTER-referendum
Do some research and you'll find stuff on the internet,, Google is your friend (though no one else is)
Do some research and you'll find stuff on the internet,, Google is your friend (though no one else is)
It benefits those who have an interest in capatilism.
I think you are a smiley short Jockstrap. Surely a sentence that funny requires seven smileys?
Happy now?
Delirious.
Hang on, I don't get this.
So are you saying that a poverty stricken Ethiopian wouldn't benefit from westernization???
Doesn't everybody.????
Sponsored Links
